FME vs. Google Maps API

I created the FME script to generate the centerline polyline. It works very well and faster than we used the Esri api from the code side.

Incentivized

If you love travelling [Google Maps API is] a must app for you it will guide you to the places. You can search pub, restaurant and places to stay easily in the locations where you never been before. With the live location sharing you'll never get lost. It is fit for every scenarios it will save your time in finding the exact location.

Incentivized

• I used that to create the polyline
• Used that to do the reprojection
• Used that to extract spatial data
• Used that to do the intersect
• Used that to do the locate

Incentivized

• Location accuracy application we used to for displaying current location.
• Easiest way to guide the map from one location to another.
• Building the scenerio based application which requires accessibility.

Incentivized

• Should allow script to change the database connection
• Should provide more details and user friendly error log information

Incentivized

• It is an easy application and it is difficult to find any problems or observations for it as it is a giant company that is always developing on its own.

Google Maps API is easy to use. Map visibility is good and accurate. Easy to search routes, distance, and travel time based on actual address to address locations or when quoting a zip code to zip code rate. The user interface is friendly and make usage easy and quick to obtain all the information I need to properly quote and plan my driver's routes.

Incentivized

It does everything I need it to do and hasn't let me down yet. It has been a lifesaver for my roofing accounts. Most of my clients for the roofing belong to an Amish community with no computers and so forth. So being able to search the maps and look at the rooftops is imperative for those campaigns.

Incentivized

FME not only be able to do the data transfer and transformation, but also be able to perform the spatial process. Astera cannot do the spatial process at the moment.

Incentivized

Though Mapbox is cheaper than Google Maps API Google map is more accurate, has a good database, and has more maps in it. It has excellent language support and a better view than Mapbox. One can personalize Google Maps more than we can do in Mapbox. Lastly, Google Map API is more reliable than Mapbox.

Incentivized

• Easy to create and easy to understand when compare to the Esri api code
• Difficult to debug when the error happens

Incentivized

• Positive: Helped me maximize rate accuracy when quoting new lanes
• Negative: Driver will use an alternate route due to my Maps route not being the best truck route
• Positive: Traffic and incident updates on real time lanes to help the drivers plan their route.

Incentivized