FloQast vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Features
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation8.50 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.20 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
It's really good in ensuring all of our accounting/finance people are on the same page and knowing what work is outstanding, at what step in the process reconcs or checklists or at, if we're tracking on time, who may need some additional support, etc. It really does a great job of letting us know when accounts are out of balance and needs to be looked at again. Ensures we will be fully ready for audit and pass with flying colors.
Read full review
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking of close tasks thanks to the monthly close calendar option
  • Review - tasks are stamped with the reviewer name & date reviewed
  • Ease of review - attachments are uploaded, account balances are populated via communication with the ERP, Note feature allows for review comments
Read full review
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great to see drill down capabilities between account reconciliations/flux analyses that links to our transactional data in our ERP.
  • I would like to see a litte more customization available in the analytics tab to add custom filter drop downs.
  • I believe this is close to being released, but I'd like to see anticipated time commitments on the task level to be able to easily review capacity type reporting/analytics.
Read full review
  • The steps of setting up the loading of data is slightly painful.
  • The steps and error message while connecting the process workflow has to provide a hint on which area needed to be fixed (because it could be anywhere or anything).
  • The combination of 2 segments for the excel upload on what's needed to eliminate is yet to resolved. Which made the entire list very long.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Based on our business requirements, its current implementation and way of use (in terms of the efficiceny) it's more than certain that we will renew our contract with CCH Tagetik. CCH Tagetik increased our efficiency regarding reporting and provides more features which made it easier to take decisions. Besides of that, it provided he best solutions for reporting according to the Solvency II standards. Since this is still the case, it is also a reason to stay with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
On a general level, it is a flexible, streamlined system, that can integrate operational data with accounting data for a better financial overview and budget planning. Reporting wise, the types and the amount of data analysis available or that can be created are close to endless. Having a quicker, more flexible way of analysing data certainly means better, faster reporting and better use of the data itself.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
I have had the pleasure of attending some courses at the dutch offices of CCH Tagetik. These were very educational with excellent trainers, a very enjoyable accomodation and they helped me a lot with regards to starting to use CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used BlackLine at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than BlackLine and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. BlackLine seemed like a separate system and was not really connected to Intacct (they used Intacct as well at my previous job). Everything just seemed clumsy with that system. FQ is smoother.
Read full review
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate information. But as I have not used this software much and tagetik more, this is all I can say
Read full review
Scalability
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has helped to reduce time to close from 7-8 days to 5 days .
  • Allows all entities to follow the same process globally. This has reduced risk and allowed great oversight at the parent entity level.
  • This has allowed the accounting team to provide real-time updates to the CFO and FP&A on close status.
Read full review
  • It has definitely helped to standardize reporting across the company. Teams are able to pull the same reports and everything has the same feel to it.
  • Since there are so many standard reports that we are able to create, it makes the analysts jobs easier since they are not spending so much time re-creating reports.
  • With any system, there is going to be some admin work required. Creating new reports, accounts and entities does take time, but it is fairly simple and doesn't take a ton of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage