TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Firecracker

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AFirecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services. Firecracker enables users to deploy workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs that may provide security and workload isolation over traditional VMs, while enabling the speed and resource efficiency of containers. Firecracker was developed at Amazon Web Services with the goal of improving services like AWS Lambda…N/A

    LXD

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/ALXD is a system container and virtual machine manager. It offers a unified user experience around full Linux systems running inside containers or virtual machines. LXD is image based and provides images for a wide number of Linux distributions. It supports various use cases, with support for different storage backends and network types and the option to install on hardware ranging from an individual laptop or cloud instance to a full server rack. LXD is written in Go. It is free software…N/A
    Pricing
    FirecrackerLXD
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FirecrackerLXD
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    FirecrackerLXD
    Server Virtualization
    Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Firecracker and Linux Containers LXD
    Feature
    Firecracker
    6.4
    1 Ratings
    24% below category average
    Linux Containers LXD
    -
    Ratings
    Virtual machine automated provisioning6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management console8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Live virtual machine backup6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Live virtual machine migration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hypervisor-level security5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FirecrackerLXD
    Small Businesses
    Proxmox VE
    Score9 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    VMware vSOM (discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    VMware Workstation Pro
    Score8.2 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FirecrackerLXD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FirecrackerLXD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    While deploying workloads in lightweight microVMs presents a couple of perks, Firecracker may not be the best software to handle this. Startup times are slow and scalability is quite limited because of the jailer and virtualization barriers. We have had security breaches on isolated EC2 instances while using Firecracker. It however has a silver lining by improving how serverless functions in container ecosystems are run with their VMMs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Linux Containers LXD works very well when you, as a software developer using Linux, need to spin up a development environment to build and work on a specific piece of software. For example, you need to build some software that is tested and developed target Ubuntu 18.04. You're able to quickly create a container for Ubuntu 18.04 and log into it to run commands and build your software. This is easier to do than setting a virtual machine - e.g - via Virtual Box, but is a lot clunkier than doing it via Docker containers which give you a much more flexible configuration of the environment and are easier to start, stop, connect and share with other developers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • It makes it easy to secure virtual machines as they are segmented into microvms with a minimal attack surface area
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • GIT repositories.
    • Authentication servers.
    • Application instances.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Excludes devices unnecessarily
    • Has a slow startup time the basis being to improve security which is quite irrelevant.
    • It has limited functionalities on monitoring VMs despite being an open source.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Ease of use.
    • Copying containers from one machine to another.
    • Creation of containers with config files similar to Docker.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Linux Containers LXD feels like a more primitive version of docker, docker-compose and similar projects from the docker ecosystem. The Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml methods of specifying a container setup, as well as the network and file configurations afforded by Docker make working with containers much easier and more reproducible than with Linux Containers LXD.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Low memory overhead on each microVM
    • We can run workloads from different customers on the same machine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Save workload.
    • Save time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots