TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Figma

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AFigma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.

    $15

    per month per editor

    Miro

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AMiro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FigmaMiro
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $144
    per year
    Organization
    $540
    per year
    Starter
    Free
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigmaMiro
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigmaMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    Chose Figma
    Miro is more user-friendly than Figma, but is less robust in terms of web prototyping and graphic design. While Figma isn't made to be used as a design tool, our team has taken to using it as such because it's richer in functions and personalizations compared to Miro and Figma.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I think Figma is better because it's easier to create more visually appealing work. I would say that Figma is better for people who are used to using this sort of visual design software/platform. Whereas I think Miro is better for first time users, it doesn't offer as many …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    In Figma I can make websites and apps. With Miro I can brainstorm about how I want the app to be and what my ideas are.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I believe when it comes to prototyping and visualisation I would say Figma is way better than above mentioned tools. However, when it comes to workshops, brainstroming exercises and running sessions, I feel Miro might be better as compared to figjam and Mural. Figma is quite …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma stands out against Adobe XD in that it is better in every way, easier to use and with more advanced tools that allow for greater customization of components and efficiency when designing. While Figma is not a 1:1 of Miro, the white boarding tool, it does have some overlap …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma has an overall better user experience, an advanced organization tool, better commentary system. And regarding prototyping, Miro doesn't stand a chance.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Adobe XD is an absurd copycat that never got to have even 10% of Figma's features. It's hyper fast because it's native, but that's the only good thing it has.

    Axure RP is an excellent prototyping software, with Local Variables and complex interactions. But it's also extremely …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Compared to Adobe XD, the Figma tool is much easier to use, offers more features, and has a much lower cost. Its features are less complex, making it very easy to teach beginners how to use it. The navigable prototype is also easier and more efficient to share in Figma compared …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma easily wins against Adobe XD. Asset sharing on XD was a pain. Figma makes it really easy by allowing you to export any layer as an asset. XD had no comments making it incredibly hard to communicate with the designer in remote settings. XD's prototyping system was not good …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I prefer using Figma the most so far during the past several years over tools like JustInMind and/or UX Pin.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Way better than all of them. Ease of use, aesthetic, modern feel, ability to invite people in.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I prefer to use it comparing to Adobe XD. It surely is more intuitive and still develops itself providing new features (e.g. variables; however, I had to get used to the new interface). Now, if I had to compare it to Axure it'd depend on the project I'm working on. In case of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is the go-to design tool that can be pushed to production very easily with developer tools. In my opinion it's the most complete design tool that considers the entire design process including the creation of solid design systems, high-fidelity prototyping, user testing, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is the best for collaborative work. Very easy to learn, so easy that most people dont use it properly (which is good and bad at the same time). Prototyping is where I'd wish it will improve. Axure was awesome.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is way better than Adobe Illustrator because of its ability to seamlessly integrate multiple use cases like mobile design and vector-based shape building. While Adobe Illustrator is great for adding texture and depth to illustration you can still build high-end …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma has more features than Zeplin or Axure. Unlike Zeplin it allows to create and share dynamic prototypes. Unlike Axure it gives tools to create detailed designs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma covers all our use cases. It helps with our design systems, pattern libraries, and prototyping; it's helpful to be cloud-based and sharable. Its plugins and usability for all team members make it very useful. Autolayout functionality is head and shoulders above the rest …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma blows these out the park. Adobe's system is very different, and I think this shows in their attempted acquisition of Figma. I've not used Sketch or Invision, but their lack of market presence says a lot—designers like using the best tools. Axure is definitely more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is often considered superior to Sketch and Adobe XD due to its web-based nature, enabling seamless cross-platform compatibility and real-time collaboration. While Sketch is limited to macOS and Adobe XD offers robust features, Figma's ability to work directly in the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Previously, we were using more than 1 tool for a specific use case related to design needs, but learned that Figma was more comprehensive, thus we were able to reduce usage of 2+ tools into one saving our overall budget on UX tools. Figma also seems to be an industry-wide …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Better performance or Multiplatform availability when compared to competition.
    Also easiness of use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    no comparison.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    In theory it can do the all the things these other apps offer. And it does to a certain extend. if your prototypes are not too complex it can completely remove the need for other prototyping software. Through Figjam presentation and collaboration, alternatives provide no extra …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Free Version of Figma is quite well to give rapid access to customers on reviews. Existing user base and therefore documentations, tutorials and communities.
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    FigJam is okay, but just feels more clunky than Miro. It kind of reminds me of the early versions of Miro with primitive features. Figma is still a far superior screen design tool, but I like the wireframe features built into Miro for quick mockups. I'm not sure if it will ever …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro's real power lies in bringing tools and artefacts from varied sources together into a single place for better collaboration.

    Miro's also the easiest to use and integrates well with other softwares. So, instead of trying to replace them, Miro complements them which drives a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I’ve used Google Slides, Figma (whiteboarding), Jamboard, Notion, and Google Calendar for planning and organizing content, including scheduling posts for creators. Miro stands out for combining structure, flexibility, and collaboration in a way the others don’t. It’s more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Mural is too simple FigJam is too much for designers and devs only, not for broader business
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro basically cover the needs of all the other tools. I started using Miro extensively during the pandemic and at that point only Jamboard provided similar options and was free when collaborating in a bigger group and when not everyone had a license. This is still the main …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    As I've mentioned, I've used FigJam before. FigJam is better for more detailed and design based ideation workshops. But Miro is better for people without much tech ability.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Ease of use and customization!
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Providing better templates and customization options, also real time collaboration tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Atlassian's Confluence and whiteboard is more accessible to cross functional team. I think we just have more user licence compared to what we were allowed for FigJam then Miro.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is much easier to use for non-designers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I used InVision for a while - it was interesting but without many features, the work was still very manual, the tool was soon discontinued at the company I worked for. I've used FigJam, it's a good tool, but very simple in features, which is why Miro is so important, we always …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro enable an all in one solution
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is a far more powerful and intuitive tool and it's great how you can start with a free plan.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro's interface is much cleaner and more usable than Mural, making Miro a more enjoyable experience to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    it seems more fun
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    as i said i am a Miro fangirl, so I haven't used the other ones much. to be honest they are all quite similar so to me it's a matter of habit and familiarity
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    While in Google Docs everything is listed vertical, in Miro I can use much more space and it's easier to explain dependencies and build an easy-to-understand big picture.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Nuclino was simply not feature rich enough. I may have spent an entire five minutes in it. When I can't even edit the formatting of text at all, that's an issue. Milanote is a really good tool, but isn't as flexible as Miro and tends to be on the expensive side. Miro has a big …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It's challenging to describe how Miro stacks up against every other product listed above. Some are more relevant at different stages of the design realisation journey, some are more hyperfocused to certain usecases.

    Trello for example; I found myself creating Kanban boards in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Speed, intuitivness, collaboration aspects of Miro particularly during the meetings are way beyond to competitors. Its indeed a one platform which I use daily, as a Software Architect where I'm every day work with my peers in design or process discussion Miro is invaluable. It …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    - FigJam it cost too much and don't have as may functions as Miro
    - Atlassian is not good of collaboration and doing things in creative way
    - Mural is very similar to Miro but I prefer Miro it was my first tool
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We have all these in place and use Miro on top, besides, as stated before I do not see a need in reducing tools but connecting them better. Ideal situation is done at Confluence and jira. for some of our tasks they are a bit techie driven and therefore we use Miro.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is top of list for me

    I moved to Miro as it was a welcome change and everyone in my team adapted ( noteasy unless platform is great )
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Confluence is like your organized project library, while Miro is your creative, collaborative whiteboard. But Confluence also has the whiteboard to add flows etc.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We're actively considering FigJam as an alternative, as we already use it for design outputs. But Miro has proven to have quick adoption. Nothing else, in my view, has been considered as the all-in-one nature that is comprehensive until we arrive at high-fidelity design, which …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    99%
    Would buy again
    194 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    5762 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    171 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    3761 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    188 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    5798 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    118 Answers
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2278 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    133 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    2430 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FigmaMiro
    Small Businesses
    UXPin
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    UXPin
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Marvel
    Score9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigmaMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (201 ratings)
    9.2
    (5571 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.5
    (149 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (33 ratings)
    9.1
    (104 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (15 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (17 ratings)
    7.5
    (46 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3586 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    7.9
    (9 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (3934 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (15 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    5.8
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigmaMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    Figma is a solid design tool to craft the UX design concepts/solutions for digital products. For printed marketing materials such as brochures, marketing flyers, press releases, etc, other design tools such as Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, or InDesign might make more sense to use for those use case scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Miro is the ideal tool where a highly collaborative environment is needed in order to be productive. Projects or ideas that are complex and require input from many people all at once are where Miro really shines. Where Miro is not ideal is when it becomes the 'source of truth' for information. Because it is very collaborative and editable by all, it's not the right tool for maintaining comprehensive information, or 'south of truth' IE project plan commitments etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • Detailed enough to create pixel perfect designs with total control over the outcome
    • Creating and implementing design systems to improve consistency and speed up design work
    • Robust prototyping tools to create simple animations or to connect various pages
    • I love autolayout, which improves design spacing and responsiveness
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Especially useful project planning with functions like whiteboard and great collaboration features.
    • Miros presentation mode is great for walking people through and explaining a concept.
    • If someone can’t join a meeting, we record a Talktrack. Its like a mini-presentation that people can watch later. Can be extremely useful at times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • Prototyping in Figma is pretty much nothing more than a glorified slide show. Sure, variables, etc are available but it takes way to long to set them up and even more time when there are revisions needed.
    • It would be helpful if there were a contextual help system for various functionality. For example, advanced autolayout (like space between) can become very tricky to implement sometimes. I often wish there were an AI assistant to ask for help. I often use ChatGTP to help me through these times.
    • Searching layers needs to be much easier and more intuitive.
    • I would like to be able to make groups like the layers palette in Photoshop. That would help with organization and speed a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • When using the find functionality to locate an item in a Miro board, I do not like that it keeps my previous searched term. Other programs, like Excel, do this but they have it so that you can easily overwrite the previously-searched term.
    • It would be helpful if you could search by a particular frame, instead of the entire board. For our quarterly backlog review, we often have items that carry over, so there are duplicates on the board. Being able to search by a frame would make this easier.
    • Understanding who can access a board is not always clear to me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    Figma is a pretty cool tool in many areas. My team almost uses it on daily basis, such as, brainstorming on product/design topics, discussing prototypes created by designers. We even use it for retrospectives, which is super convenient and naturally keeps records of what the team discusses every month. Furthermore, I do see the potential of the product - currently we mainly use it for design topics, but it seems it is also a good fit for tech diagrams, which we probably will explore further in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    It's easy to use for designers who are familiar with design terms and functions from Photoshop and Illustrator. However, non-tech and non-designer collaborators have a hard time figuring out how to leave comments and apply changes, compared to other online design tools like Canva and Squarespace. Even simple drag-and-drops and rearrangement of certain blocks become too complicated due to uncommon functions like Hug and Lock.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    My rating for Miro is 10 because it has delivered excellent outcomes for my team. We can now plan in real time before taking any action, and anyone can participate in the plans we are creating to boost our company's sales. We all have good plans and strategies for the target audience, so most team members are able to create a good incentive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    The only regret I have is, its not available when there is no internet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Figma
    I think its great, As there are many other software or systems which can be integrated with it as plugins or API's
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Figma
    I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Figma
    In-person training has its own benefits - 1. It helps in resolving queries then and there during the training. 2. I find classroom or in-person training more interactive. 3. Classroom or in-person training could be more practical in nature where participants can have an hands on experience with tools and clarify their doubts with the trainer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Figma
    Online training has its own merits and demerits - 1. Sometimes we may face issues with connectivity or the training content 2. The way training is being delivered becomes very important because not everyone is comfortable taking online training and learning by themselves. 3. With the advancement of technology online training has become popular but there is a segment of people who still prefer class-room training over online one.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    Figma compared to other tools has user friendly UI which is very easy for all levels of designers. Compared to Adobe XD and Sketch Figma is stable, while in other tools I have faced software crashing in the middle of the work which resulted in loss of data/design. Compared to other tools it's fast and shows less lag. Collaboration in Figma is very easy as it is cloud based but in XD it's not that smooth working with other designers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We tested every product, but the biggest problem we encountered was that most of them required plugins in order to centralize all of our work. Other problems included the products' excessive price, which was higher than Miro's. Last but not least, Miro offered us an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    I think this is great and as I mentioned at ADP we use Figma extensively whether by designers, researchers or content writers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • Allows us to get funding for further phases of the project (which is uncountable)
    • Well, it lets us show off when needed due to well suited UI-oriented character
    • Easily approachable by anyone (browser use)
    • User friendly interface
    • More advanced cooperation requires some of the users to have a license
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Helped to minimise the use of multiple softwares and applications for several different workflows.
    • Miro has enhanced overall productivity and project quality through intensive discussions and brainstorming sessions.
    • A great choice in terms of ROI as Miro offers a wide range of capabilities and features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Miro Screenshots

    Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.