TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FigJam

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.

    $5

    per month per editor

    Miro

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AMiro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FigJamMiro
    Editions & Modules
    FigJam Professional
    $36
    per year per editor
    FigJam Organization
    $60
    per year per editor
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigJamMiro
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigJamMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    Chose FigJam
    Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    Microsoft Whiteboards are better, in my opinion, but not friendly with Figma files (can't export layered assets, raster only). Better in the sense that the drawing and and marker tools felt more natural and the AI features are just better, like auto-shapes, vs. FigJam's …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as InVision Freehand that at the …
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    Mural is too simple FigJam is too much for designers and devs only, not for broader business
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is great for collaborating. I think it definitely is better than Mural and Jamboard because it has more features and it's easier to use. Compared to FigJam, as a designer I would probably choose FigJam to have everything in the same product. However, in my opinion, Miro …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    As I've mentioned, I've used FigJam before. FigJam is better for more detailed and design based ideation workshops. But Miro is better for people without much tech ability.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    FigJam is particularly tailored for design led product teams so lack the versatility which Miro provides
    Better for workshop facilitation but clucky UI
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Atlassian's Confluence and whiteboard is more accessible to cross functional team. I think we just have more user licence compared to what we were allowed for FigJam then Miro.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I used InVision for a while - it was interesting but without many features, the work was still very manual, the tool was soon discontinued at the company I worked for. I've used FigJam, it's a good tool, but very simple in features, which is why Miro is so important, we always …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    FigJam is okay, but just feels more clunky than Miro. It kind of reminds me of the early versions of Miro with primitive features. Figma is still a far superior screen design tool, but I like the wireframe features built into Miro for quick mockups. I'm not sure if it will ever …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    - FigJam it cost too much and don't have as may functions as Miro
    - Atlassian is not good of collaboration and doing things in creative way
    - Mural is very similar to Miro but I prefer Miro it was my first tool
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We're actively considering FigJam as an alternative, as we already use it for design outputs. But Miro has proven to have quick adoption. Nothing else, in my view, has been considered as the all-in-one nature that is comprehensive until we arrive at high-fidelity design, which …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I think Miro is definetly is better than FigJam and Mural -
    I also write Confluence - which is also a bit collaborative creative and documentation happening there -
    so it is really hard to describe why Miro is better but more freedom is helping me while it is creating …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We have a corporate contract with Miro but we also have Figma and FigJam and we use both for different roles
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I don't have much experience with FigJam, but found Miro to just be a bit cleaner and more straight forward and simple
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is by far the market leader in whiteboarding tools. It can sometimes feel overly complex for the task in hand but when you are used to all the features you are glad they are there. I like the simplicity of FigJam as a direct competitor, but sometimes need the additional …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I had to select Miro because of its superior integration, which works effortlessly, and its better functionality.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I find Miro to be more user-friendly than Figma, where we had a very steep learning curve trying to achieve real-time collaboration with both tech and non-tech users. I haven't personally spent a lot of time using that tool or others, however. At this point, I have a strong …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    it seems more fun
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    as i said i am a Miro fangirl, so I haven't used the other ones much. to be honest they are all quite similar so to me it's a matter of habit and familiarity
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is the chosen tool of my organisation. However it is easily the best of these with a good cross section of functionality.

    I have also used Microsoft Whiteboard in clients that do not allow Miro in their environment - there is no contest.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    My company chose Miro but I have found it to work well
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It stands out because of its versatility, number of tools and balance between structure and creativity.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We would a central whiteboarding collaboration tools to streamline the process and cost. And miro is more suitable for different users and use cases inside the organization and the majority of us already have license to miro and there's a solid foundation of user adoption …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I actually love them both. But, Miro has an advantage in the company I work with. There we have both business people that are not at all accustomed wit Figma, but are well versed with Miro. With Miro, its easier to conduct workshops outside of the tech and design team.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It's easier to navigate, simpler to use and I enjoy the brand and experience of using the product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It was selected by leadership prior to me joining the company. I am now however a big supporter of Miro and use it very frequently.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    i prefer how Miro uses sticky notes
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    5762 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    3761 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    67%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    5798 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2278 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    2430 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FigJamMiro
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Freehand by InVision
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Freehand by InVision
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigJamMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.2
    (5571 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (149 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (104 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (15 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (46 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3586 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (9 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3934 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (15 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.8
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigJamMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    If you're working in small product teams, like triads, and already using Figma, this is a no brainer for white boarding, quick/fast sketches, wireframing, collaborative doodling ... it gets less appropriate with large teams, infrequent. IMO, due to the way in which they price, it's better to keep the inner circle small-ish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Miro is the ideal tool where a highly collaborative environment is needed in order to be productive. Projects or ideas that are complex and require input from many people all at once are where Miro really shines. Where Miro is not ideal is when it becomes the 'source of truth' for information. Because it is very collaborative and editable by all, it's not the right tool for maintaining comprehensive information, or 'south of truth' IE project plan commitments etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
    • Easy to preview
    • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Especially useful project planning with functions like whiteboard and great collaboration features.
    • Miros presentation mode is great for walking people through and explaining a concept.
    • If someone can’t join a meeting, we record a Talktrack. Its like a mini-presentation that people can watch later. Can be extremely useful at times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It misses easy-to-use pre sets of diagrams. The ones presented seem to be not native and hard to use. Miro is a good benchmark.
    • Navegating throught projects in the main page is confusing, specially when people are not admin users.
    • It should suggest ways of organizing the pages designers do, specially when the project is big and have many pages and sections.
    • It could have, for example, a draft version for every page, so that one can hide it when they finish the work, but can open it whenever something needs to be modified, versioning the job.
    Read full review
    Miro
    • When using the find functionality to locate an item in a Miro board, I do not like that it keeps my previous searched term. Other programs, like Excel, do this but they have it so that you can easily overwrite the previously-searched term.
    • It would be helpful if you could search by a particular frame, instead of the entire board. For our quarterly backlog review, we often have items that carry over, so there are duplicates on the board. Being able to search by a frame would make this easier.
    • Understanding who can access a board is not always clear to me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    My rating for Miro is 10 because it has delivered excellent outcomes for my team. We can now plan in real time before taking any action, and anyone can participate in the plans we are creating to boost our company's sales. We all have good plans and strategies for the target audience, so most team members are able to create a good incentive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the experience much more engaging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We tested every product, but the biggest problem we encountered was that most of them required plugins in order to centralize all of our work. Other problems included the products' excessive price, which was higher than Miro's. Last but not least, Miro offered us an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • FigJam saves a lot of time ... it's nice to have all my visual notes/sketches within Figma itself where a lot of design work lives
    • The project organization and other features contribute to the ease of answering that age old question ... "where can I find that mockup?"
    • Dev Mode is pretty cool. Not many use it, so some designers may spend unnecessary time spec'ing out things that no one will appreciate, let alone look at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Helped to minimise the use of multiple softwares and applications for several different workflows.
    • Miro has enhanced overall productivity and project quality through intensive discussions and brainstorming sessions.
    • A great choice in terms of ROI as Miro offers a wide range of capabilities and features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Miro Screenshots

    Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.