TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FigJam

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.

    $5

    per month per editor

    GatherContent

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AGatherContent headquartered in London offers their content operations, collaboration and governance platform for enterprises.N/A
    Pricing
    FigJamGatherContent
    Editions & Modules
    FigJam Professional
    $36
    per year per editor
    FigJam Organization
    $60
    per year per editor
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigJamGatherContent
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigJamGatherContent
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    No answer on this topic
    GatherContent
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    67%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    FigJamGatherContent
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of FigJam and GatherContent
    Feature
    FigJam
    -
    Ratings
    GatherContent
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of FigJam and GatherContent
    Feature
    FigJam
    -
    Ratings
    GatherContent
    7.5
    1 Ratings
    1% below category average
    API00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of FigJam and GatherContent
    Feature
    FigJam
    -
    Ratings
    GatherContent
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Admin section00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Page templates00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of FigJam and GatherContent
    Feature
    FigJam
    -
    Ratings
    GatherContent
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    SEO support00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Community / comment management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FigJamGatherContent
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Umbraco CMS
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Freehand by InVision
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Square Online
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Freehand by InVision
    Score7.7 out of 10
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigJamGatherContent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigJamGatherContent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    If you're working in small product teams, like triads, and already using Figma, this is a no brainer for white boarding, quick/fast sketches, wireframing, collaborative doodling ... it gets less appropriate with large teams, infrequent. IMO, due to the way in which they price, it's better to keep the inner circle small-ish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    We create and manage content for various client's websites. The customizable workflows, assignments and user roles help us keep everyone accountable to deadlines. It is transparent, collaborative, and more efficient for all.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
    • Easy to preview
    • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    • Easy to navigate interface.
    • Customizable workflow.
    • Set up project templates for recurring projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It misses easy-to-use pre sets of diagrams. The ones presented seem to be not native and hard to use. Miro is a good benchmark.
    • Navegating throught projects in the main page is confusing, specially when people are not admin users.
    • It should suggest ways of organizing the pages designers do, specially when the project is big and have many pages and sections.
    • It could have, for example, a draft version for every page, so that one can hide it when they finish the work, but can open it whenever something needs to be modified, versioning the job.
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    • Getting emails for every single change is really annoying.
    • It seems pretty easy, but I suggest you take time to train anyone who will be working on it.
    • API integrations could be better as it doesn't work 100% of the time.
    • Layouts created are static and you can not move the order.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the experience much more engaging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • FigJam saves a lot of time ... it's nice to have all my visual notes/sketches within Figma itself where a lot of design work lives
    • The project organization and other features contribute to the ease of answering that age old question ... "where can I find that mockup?"
    • Dev Mode is pretty cool. Not many use it, so some designers may spend unnecessary time spec'ing out things that no one will appreciate, let alone look at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GatherContent
    • Accountability to deadlines and roles.
    • Less emails and less multiple documents.
    • Large scale content management for new websites.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots