TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FacilityBot

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AFacilityBot is a messaging-first smart facilities management system, designed to make interactions as convenient as possible for all users. FacilityBot has features of a mobile CMMS system such as fault reporting, preventive maintenance checklists, and asset management, and it also allows flexible configurations, such as configurable request forms and workflows, that allow adaption to an organisation’s unique building workflows. The digital connection established with building occupants also…N/A

    Hippo CMMS

    Score2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…

    $35

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FacilityBotHippo CMMS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Hippo Starter
    $35
    per month per user
    Hippo Plus
    $55
    per month per user
    Hippo Pro
    $75
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FacilityBotHippo CMMS
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
    Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FacilityBotHippo CMMS
    Considered Both Products
    FacilityBot
    Chose FacilityBot
    FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike …
    Incentivized
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    User Ratings
    FacilityBotHippo CMMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    2.0
    (8 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FacilityBotHippo CMMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    FacilityBot
    Facilities Managers spend their days ensuring that the building operations are running smoothly and efficiently. Using FacilityBot helps them to digitize their FM workflows so that can manage their time more easily and effectively. It's all about working smarter, not harder! The asset management function of FacilityBot is also beneficial and useful. The tool also provides easy-to-read statistics reports for users.
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    FacilityBot
    • Fault Reporting
    • Asset Management
    • Preventive Maintenance
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Simple to use Work requester.
    • Great customer service and support.
    • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    FacilityBot
    • Limited checklist templates
    • To have extension for the free trial
    • There is room for improvement in terms of customization of simple reports.
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
    • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
    • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    FacilityBot
    No answers on this topic
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    FacilityBot
    FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike FacilityBot, the implementation wasn't as straightforward. In terms of features, not many are as feature-rich as FacilityBot.
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    FacilityBot
    • Quick and prompt fault reporting and tracking
    • Save cost and resources
    • FacilityBot also provides simple and evaluated statistics
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
    • Decision making is now with hard data
    • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Hippo CMMS Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot