A10 Thunder ADC vs. F5 BIG-IP SSL Orchestrator

I recommend it but would like to mention that the buyer should analyze their needs very well and perform exhaustive service tests prior to purchase.

Incentivized

I would recommend it when we are using the device out of office as it helps to secure the data in it

Incentivized

• It offers very good performance.
• Really fast deployment.

Incentivized

• its very secure
• it had 2 step authentication
• it was cost effective to the company

Incentivized

• WAF
• ADC Templates

Incentivized

• It is a software with a somewhat complex documentation so when you are in doubt it is difficult to solve it through its documentation.
• A good knowledge is required in the management of the software, because although its implementation is flexible, carrying it out in the appropriate way guarantees good operation.
• Its price can be somewhat high if it is a small company, however considering its high versatility the investment is worth it.
• Learning curve somewhat steep, but you can count on the support of your support team.

Incentivized

its very easy to use and user friendly

Incentivized

Support said the devices will work in our environment but when we had the device working we realized that it was not possible to do what we wanted, for this reason, our experience was not entirely good and we did not like the way they approached us for the sale of the device.

Incentivized

OpenSSL is a simple software to use, with a complete documentation and an easy installation and ideal for encrypting and decrypting and making certificates, however F5 SSL Orchestrator can be implemented in different ways, it provides a high visibility of the traffic which does not miss any threat It wants to hide in encrypted traffic, but its biggest advantage is that it helps to better manage and does not provide static but dynamic devices so it is possible to decrypt once or encrypt once, it is for all these powerful features that F5 SSL Orchestrator was chosen.

Incentivized

• A10 Thunder ADC had a negative impact on the company, due to the fact that the client had to monitor a large number of sites, which could not be achieved with this device.
• This led to looking for another alternative.
• It is more beneficial for companies that do not need to monitor a large number of websites as the security and stability provided by the device are excellent.

Incentivized

• By providing a high vision of inbound and outbound traffic, we manage to avoid the entry of threats and the exposure or loss of data from our business infrastructure.
• Its policy based management is very helpful, since it is much simpler to manage SSL traffic and to be aware of any attack coming from it and to apply security controls to all business traffic.

Incentivized