F5 BIG-IP vs. Pinggy
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() F5 BIG-IP | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | F5 BIG-IP software from Seattle-based F5 Networks is a load balancing and application protection solution suite available on cloud or via virtual editions, on a subscription or perpetual licensing basis. | N/A |
Pinggy | N/A | N/A | Pinggy is presented as a simple localhost tunneling solution. With Pinggy, users can create HTTP, TCP, UDP, or TLS tunnels to a localhost, enabling instant access to websites or applications, even behind firewalls and NATs. There is no need to download anything, no complex server configurations - just streamlined, secure access for developers, teams, and innovators. | $3 per month per seat |
| F5 BIG-IP | Pinggy | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $30 per month per seat | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Plan: Enterprise Contact Us: contact@pinggy.io Features: 1. Dedicated Servers / On Premise 2. Unlimited persistent tunnels 3. Unlimited custom subdomains 4. Unlimited custom domains 5. Unlimited persistent TCP/UDP ports 6. Unlimited Teams 7. API to monitor and manage tunnels 8. Priority Discord & Call Support | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP | Pinggy | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
99% Would buy again 195 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 158 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 194 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 132 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 148 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| F5 BIG-IP | Pinggy | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | ![]() Azure Application Gateway Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | NetScaler Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| F5 BIG-IP | Pinggy | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.2 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| F5 BIG-IP | Pinggy | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Pinggy Screenshots |









