F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Verona

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
F5 Networks provides BIG-IP Access Policy Manager as an identity and access solution which can be deployed as a standalone solution or as an add-on to F5 Networks' flagship BIG-IP TLM or F5 Advanced WAF applications.N/A
Verona
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Features
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
9.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Verona
-
Ratings
AES 256-bit Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Kill Switch10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Support Services8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Verona
Likelihood to Recommend
In the current digital world we are moving into, I would recommend F5 for all SMB to enterprise organizations. There are various models to pick from. This helps secure the environment and make the network robust to any sort of attacks. I am not able to think of any reason why one should not deploy or this device is less appropriate because nowadays every small company has application / ERPs. It is also worthwhile to note in case if all your apps are being deployed in the cloud by another service provider who provides you SAAS access, in that case, you can be at ease as securing these app falls on to the provider. However, should the budget be available I would recommend deploy this and enhancing your security.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Source and destination IP Base policy
  • Source and application base policy
  • Ssl VPN with load balancing and fail over policy working fine.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • CCU Licenses are limited by device and are not shared between APM devices
  • User sessions are not stored globally, so persistence can be an issue with users all over the world
  • Configuration can get complicated when split up between multiple sites
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Integration with F5 BIG-IP systems that we plan to keep using for a while.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
If F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager usability is fine it's not hard to use if you read the documentation but it does feel dated and could use a responsive design update to modernize user interface to current standards.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager integrates extremely well with the rest of our F5 infrastructure which is a big plus and provides us with a familiar user interface, but it isn't as scalable in its current iteration as something like Zscaler Private Access.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive is that due to how much F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager can do, the F5 is the landing spot in our environment for MFA authentication.
  • It has allowed a technology the company originally bought for load balancing to be used for multiple purposes.
  • F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has made the environment more trusting of F5 as a MFA.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots