F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF vs. NGINX Plus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
F5 Networks offers the Advanced Web Application Firewall (WAF) to provide bot defense, advanced application protection, anti-bot SDK, and other features.N/A
NGINX Plus
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Plus is presented as a cloud‑native, easy-to-use reverse proxy, load balancer, and API gateway, from F5.
$849
per month billed annually
Pricing
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$849
per month billed annually
Advanced
$2,099
per month billed annually
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Features
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
-
Ratings
NGINX Plus
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAFNGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
Advanced WAF is well suited for protection against account enumeration attacks, protection against known and new increasing attack vectors through out of the box attack signatures and threat campaigns. Also, up to date and accurate IP intelligence database to block based on known IP reputation.
Read full review
I think that NGINX Plus could be used in place of a hardware load balancer and it would be light weight and easier to configure than a hardware based load balancer but in terms of usability a GUI for said load balancer would definitely help in setting up
Read full review
Pros
  • So the product definitely is helping us for sudden attacks through DDOS, some injection ingestion into UI URLs, and definitely it's capturing those and I definitely see that as an advantage for us. They can stop the hackers from using our endpoints.
Read full review
  • Load balancing
  • Caching
  • App security
  • Boost App performance
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI for events. E.g., clicking the "Accept" button does nothing.
  • Traffic learning suggestions are often very incorrect. We were originally suggested to use "Automatic" learning, and had to completely scrap the policy due to the suggestions.
  • "All in one" dashboard for viewing application URL/parameter overrides per policy.
Read full review
  • An AI bot would be cool to help build config files
  • More webinars for advanced NGINX Plus would be great
  • GUI tool... might already be one available
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We just love work with f5
Read full review
No reason not to renew it, we are happy with it.
Read full review
Usability
Most* of it is very intuitive and easy to use. The "Help" section is fairly fantastic. See some of my other comments about things like the "Traffic Learning" section being wildly wrong sometimes, and also the event logs with UI buttons that don't do anything. Overall though, it's an excellent product.
Read full review
The UI is not there.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We had an issue after upgrading from RHEL 7 to 8, and there were some issues that the security team imposed upon the platform with a scanning tool. We also had a VXLAN environment that was not properly sending a gratuitous arp to the network. NGINX support was instrumental to speedily resolving our issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I believe that in the case of Big-IP F5, it has a lot of power, a lot of features including the VPN features and also the evaluation of security posture of the devices that connect through VPN. That's very solid and that's something that is not found in all the WAF solutions and so I haven't seen that in Azure.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • In our case it has been great because the pricing is just right for all the features that we have on the platform and the flexibility. In fact, we acquired another license last year, so that's something that we're interested in. We are currently moving towards the cloud with our ERP systems and eliminating the IBM platform, so we would like to see that F5 virtual option available on Azure.
Read full review
  • We are planning by using NGINX it can greatly reduce our OPEX by 50% "just our own running APIGW" the cascading effects in the long run will be much more.
Read full review
ScreenShots