| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 EZ Texting | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | EZ Texting provides businesses and organizations with a text marketing solution, including features and integrations to keep conversations going. The solution can be used by businesses to connect with their audiences. It can be used to send promotions, promote a new product, build brand awareness, or drive traffic to websites or storefronts. EZ Texting Key Features EZ Texting's features are designed to enhance the effectiveness of text marketing… | $25 per month |
| EZ Texting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | LAUNCH PLAN: Recommended for up to 500 contacts. Local EZ Textable Number. Max Speed: up to 500/day. Cost Per Msg:$0.030. Delivery Rate: 95% Includes 500 free msg/mo or 6k annually. BOOST PLAN: Recommended for 501-2,000 contacts. Local EZ High-Volume Number. Max Speed: up to 2,000/day. Cost Per Msg: $0.025. Delivery Rate: 95% Includes 500 free msg/mo or 6k annually. SCALE PLAN: Recommended for 2,000-50,000 contacts. Local EZ High-Volume, High-Speed Number. Max Speed: up to 50,000/day. Cost Per Msg: $0.020. Delivery Rate: 95%. Includes 500 free msg/mo or 6k annually. ENTERPRISE PLAN: Recommended for 50,000+ contacts. This Plan offers. Dedicated Short Codes. Max Speed: up to 1 MM/day. Cost Per Msg: $0.010. Delivery Rate: 99%. Includes 200k msg/mo. Pricing information for EZ Texting is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase EZ Texting must be conducted with the seller. Included in All Plans: Unlimited Incoming Messages, Contacts, & Keywords. New Features: Realize ROI faster with AI Compose & Team Inbox with AI Reply. Live Support Chat: Monday-Friday 8am-8pm ET and Saturday-Sunday 9am-5pm ET. Growth Tools: QR Codes, Keywords & Signup Forms. MMS Edge: Enhanced Image Library + Editor powered by Shutterstock. CRM-Lite: Upload, Management, Groups & Personalization. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| EZ Texting | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose EZ Texting Fairly similar Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting EZ Texting was just better priced, easier to use Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting Hatch is very good, and integrates with a lot of CRM's, but it's relatively expensive and a heavier lift to get started. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting We chose EZ Texting over enterprise solutions because of it's ease of set up, ease of use, and low barrier to entry. We had discussions with other companies, and it seemed very complicated and would require a lot of set up on our end. We don't have a dedicated IT or marketing … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting I haven't used similar so I will skip Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting I think Constant Contact was Terrible. Cumbersome. Terrible compliance department. It never worked for me. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting We have only ever used EZ Texting and have no reason to look anywhere else. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting I haven't used other products Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting did the Mailchimp trial, but see no reason to switch Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose EZ Texting We selected EZ texting because it was the easiest to use. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
90% Would buy again 95 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
94% Delivers good value for the price 88 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
93% Happy with the feature set 98 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 87 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
97% Implementation went as expected 96 Answers | |
| EZ Texting | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  SimpleTexting Score7.6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Attentive Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Airship Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| EZ Texting | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.9 |
| Usability | 8.4 |
| Availability | 8.0 |
| Performance | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.6 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 |
| Configurability | 7.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | 7.0 |
| Professional Services | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 10.0 |
| EZ Texting | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Reliability and Availability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
|
| Scalability |
|
| Professional Services |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | EZ Texting Screenshots     |
