TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Experitest vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Experitest

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AExperitest is a mobile and web app performance testing solution, allowing users to simulate different servers, measure transaction duration, and speed index. Understand website and web application response from client to server to UI render. Analyze performance across time, versions, and tests.N/A

    SoapUI Open Source

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ASoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
    Pricing
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Considered Both Products
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    No answer on this topic
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText UFT One
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    Score9.3 out of 10
    ReadyAPI
    Score7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ExperitestSoapUI Open Source
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    Experitest is among the best when comes to Mobile QA automation needs and it has come a long way since I started using 5 years ago. I would love see Experitest growing from mobile and web QA to E2E test automation player.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • Wide range of mobile devices and Tablets
    • Wide range of Browsers
    • Responsiveness of the platform.
    • Test Automation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Ease of implementation
    • Ease of use
    • User friendly interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • Expanding from Mobile QA to kiosks, wearables testing.
    • Complicated licensing system.
    • I somehow feel the older model of cloud option was better than current SaaS model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    Extremely good UI and gives a solid feeling when using the platform. We do not have to spend a lot of time training the other resources as the UI is so intuitive and self explanatory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    Support is one of the key areas in this field and Experitest excels in that. I have some very good friends over there and they are always ready to help.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    ExperiTest provides similar capabilities but the tools differentiates in providing a scriptless automation platform alongside. Also provides a very good integration with wide variety of Automation frameworks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • Provided a considerable saving in procuring devices across different delivery centers
    • Extremely fast platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
    • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
    • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots