Euna Grants, powered by eCivis vs. Fluxx Grantmaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Euna Grants, powered by eCivis
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Euna Grants, powered by eCivis, offers a SaaS grant management system, often in use by state, local and tribal governments. Euna Grants helps government agencies maximize their grant revenues, track their financial and program performance, prepare cost allocation plans and budgets, and access free open data tools to make sense of Federal data.N/A
Fluxx Grantmaker
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Fluxx in San Francisco offers Grantmaker, this being their grant management platform for funders, providing clear data exploration tools and customizable dashboard, dynamic workflow with audit trail, and many collaboration and sharing tools.N/A
Pricing
Euna Grants, powered by eCivisFluxx Grantmaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Euna Grants, powered by eCivisFluxx Grantmaker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Euna Grants, powered by eCivisFluxx Grantmaker
User Ratings
Euna Grants, powered by eCivisFluxx Grantmaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Euna Grants, powered by eCivisFluxx Grantmaker
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Grantmaker is well suited for managing grant-making processes and records. It's not a very good tool for CRM. We are currently working with an outside vendor to design a module that will integrate with Grantmaker to help with CRM.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Highly configurable for different use cases and easy to customize.
  • Instant insight into different job functions can be provided through the unique, customized filtered cards and dashboards for each user.
  • Frequent updates of new features that add more value to the product over time and create more efficiencies for staff and grantees.
  • Collaborative user base that is eager and willing to share best practices with lots of support from the vendor.
  • Friendly staff that is genuinely interested in the funding and nonprofit sectors and how they can make it easier for us to have the community impact we are all trying to achieve.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • I would love to see either email or text notifications added to the platforms to remind of upcoming deadlines and tasks.
  • Sometimes the data that is pulled into the visuals is not accurate and is a bit glitchy.
  • Adding a real time commenting capability, like Slack, would help the team to stay in contact. This is especially important for remote grantwriters, like me.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have an assigned rep who is very responsive and is able to answer any questions. Other than that, the technical support has been terrible. I often don't waste time documenting bugs because I know they likely won't get fixed or even followed-up on. Instead, I search for workarounds.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Fluxx is not only more intuitive than CyberGrants, its interface is also smoother and easier. Fluxx allows proposers to enter and attach proposal information in a more appealing platform than in CyberGrants. Fluxx also retains more historic data than CyberGrants
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Better funding for our youth programs
  • Successful garnering of unrestricted funds
  • Business expansion via better staff funding
Read full review
ScreenShots