etracker vs. Google Content Experiments (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
etracker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
etracker is a web optimization solution.  The vendor says their customers use this solution for visitor statistics, usage analysis and gain information regarding visitor origin. This solution includes a set of website optimization tools that include: Web analysis and online marketing in real-time Satisfaction analysis through visitor surveys and feedback button Mouse tracking to uncover user experience obstacles App tracking for the assessment of the…N/A
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.N/A
Pricing
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Features
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
etracker
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
11% above category average
a/b experiment testing9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Split URL testing8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test significance9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page surveys9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Preview mode9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Server-side tests9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
etracker
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Website personalization9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
etracker
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Heatmap tool9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test reporting9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Results segmentation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
User Ratings
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
etrackerGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very helpful for a product development company as well as a software support team.
Read full review
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
Read full review
Pros
  • Web analytics
  • Reporting
  • Comparing segment/parts
Read full review
  • When you need to measure against event-based goals
  • If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
  • Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
  • Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
Read full review
Cons
  • Lesser fields to populate
Read full review
  • You can only optimise for one goal, so if you have several conversions, like phone call and email you need to do it manually.
  • It seems not to work that well for pages with lower amounts of traffic - not great for new or niche sites.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I would love to use and recommend this.
Read full review
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I like etracker better than Bound. I feel the UI and info are easier and cleaner.
Read full review
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It gave us good insight into where people were going/clicking on website.
Read full review
  • Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
  • We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
  • Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
Read full review
ScreenShots