Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.
N/A
Unanet ERP GovCon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Unanet ERP GovCon is software for government contractors offered on-premise or in the cloud. Features include resource planning, skills management, budgeting, forecasting, time tracking, expense reporting, billing, revenue recognition, and project status and performance reporting.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor Kinetic
Unanet ERP GovCon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor Kinetic
Unanet ERP GovCon
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor Kinetic
Unanet ERP GovCon
Features
Epicor Kinetic
Unanet ERP GovCon
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
13 Ratings
3% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.39 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
27 Ratings
1% below category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
9.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
10% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
9.031 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
22% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.037 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
9.037 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
37 Ratings
2% below category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.035 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
37 Ratings
17% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.921 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.9
40 Ratings
12% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pricing
9.037 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.040 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.039 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
23 Ratings
15% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Billing Management
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.218 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
19 Ratings
19% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.612 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
7.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
14 Ratings
16% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
3 Ratings
19% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.6
21 Ratings
15% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
22 Ratings
26% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.5
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
9.92 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.15 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Epicor is an excellent system for most manufacturing customers and offers several features previously only offered on the very large (e.g. Oracle, PeopleSoft, etc) level platforms. Yet the pricing is mid-level, and the expandability through additional modules provides a great opportunity for future business growth. The architecture is easily scalable, fast, and offers great options for both on premise and hosted systems. Epicor is flexible, and large enough that regular updates and enhancements continue to be adopted to improve functionality and effectiveness. It is however, not for everyone. Competition in this sector is very good, with several mid-level systems being available at a similar price point. If you are considering adopting a new ERP system and are in the plastics space, you also owe it to yourself and your team to consider IQMS, which is becoming a de-facto standard in this segment. Also, for specific medical sectors, you will find that Epicor software validation for CFR Part 11 compliance can be quite costly-- although the software is capable of supporting this with modification. Overall, Epicor is a solid choice. Ultimately, it will be up to your team to determine what works best for your needs. You won't be disappointed with Epicor if you do the due diligence and take the time needed to properly review and demo the product. Remember though, demos are typically "best case" staged, so be sure to throw several curveballs at your vendor and bring out the unique requirements of your business.
Unanet is a great system and has really helped our managers gain more insight to their projects. We have faster timesheet completion rates which leads to faster billing. We have been very happy with the system but there are some trial and error scenarios where it takes us some time to actually get the data needed or use the system the way we need it to be utilized. Thankfully they do have a great support staff that assists with issues as they arise.
Epicor has the best product configurator that I have seen on the market. This was one of the main reasons we went with Epicor, and have not been disappointed at all.
Epicor is also one of the easiest ERP system to learn, and has many ways for users to get training. Epicor University, on-line courses, or class room settings, also user conference every year, and user support groups.
The Enterprise search ability in Epicor is great, can find parts, customers, suppliers, etc. so easily. And if you can't remember where a report or task that you want to do is on the menu, you can search for that also.
I give this rating because the software has good functionality and usability. The system does not crash and can also be maintained under overall conditions in any business function. We utilize this to communicate effectively in various areas and make informed business decisions. This is highly rated as we make other changes to our organization
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
The support of Unanet is incredible, A simple email to their support team always gets a response in less than 24 hours and is really solutions focused. Unanet support is the best out there- guaranteed
Everyone at our organization really appreciated "made 2 manage" because of all of the quick access and some of the capabilities in accounting. So far, Epicor is much more advanced but the two can stand side by side. These two programs cannot really be compared just because it's just not fair to compare an on-site server ERP system to a cloud-based one.
We were used to Deltek's Costpoint from the prior company and Unanet is far easier to use for users, accounting personnel, project managers, and corporate managers. Continuous enhancements lead us to believe that Unanet will be even better in meeting our needs.
The software is pretty easy to use. Things are pretty clear on how to do them and if you don't know how to do something they have instructions on how to do them or you get an error code telling you exactly what to do. I have been satisfied with my overall experience.
The ROI can be hard to quantify. We spend more time setting up and entering information up front, but we spend less time than before trying to track project costs so that evens out. Purchasing the system and implementing it was very expensive, but the benefit is the the better information can save money on projects as we know where best to spend our time and identify potential problems earlier on a project. We believe it will have a positive impact, but I'd say it will take a few years (3-4) to be worth it.