Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.
N/A
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a modular ERP that enables users to run mission-critical operations in real time from anywhere, introduce new business models in any industry, and expand globally. SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a SaaS product and can also be deployed in a hybrid landscape for quicker time to value. SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a foundational component of the SAP…
N/A
Pricing
Epicor Kinetic
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor Kinetic
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Per user, per month
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor Kinetic
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Features
Epicor Kinetic
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
13 Ratings
3% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
290 Ratings
15% above category average
Pay calculation
7.713 Ratings
8.0248 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.79 Ratings
8.3248 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.39 Ratings
8.0242 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
27 Ratings
1% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
7.9
424 Ratings
4% above category average
API for custom integration
9.025 Ratings
7.9406 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.022 Ratings
7.8376 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
10% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.4
487 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.031 Ratings
8.7457 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.038 Ratings
8.2480 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
22% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
7.9
494 Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
9.037 Ratings
7.9462 Ratings
Standard reports
9.037 Ratings
8.0487 Ratings
Custom reports
9.033 Ratings
7.8453 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
37 Ratings
2% below category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
485 Ratings
7% above category average
Accounts payable
9.035 Ratings
8.4478 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.036 Ratings
8.3460 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.016 Ratings
8.149 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.017 Ratings
8.148 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.020 Ratings
8.248 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.018 Ratings
8.245 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.019 Ratings
8.651 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
37 Ratings
17% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.6
426 Ratings
8% above category average
Inventory tracking
9.036 Ratings
8.5417 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.921 Ratings
8.3361 Ratings
Location management
9.029 Ratings
8.2344 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.9
40 Ratings
12% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.4
437 Ratings
7% above category average
Pricing
9.037 Ratings
8.2416 Ratings
Order entry
9.040 Ratings
8.5425 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.219 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.039 Ratings
8.5400 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.916 Ratings
8.040 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
23 Ratings
15% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.6
52 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
9.018 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.019 Ratings
7.946 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.713 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.914 Ratings
8.042 Ratings
Period Close
8.218 Ratings
8.250 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
19 Ratings
19% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
14 Ratings
9% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.612 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.47 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.25 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
7.36 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
7 Ratings
5% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.3
27 Ratings
11% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
8.03 Ratings
8.327 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
14 Ratings
16% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.2
49 Ratings
17% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.75 Ratings
8.138 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.04 Ratings
8.238 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.75 Ratings
8.135 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.08 Ratings
8.443 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.011 Ratings
8.343 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
3 Ratings
19% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
9.8
1 Ratings
40% above category average
Risk Repository
8.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Control Management
8.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Issue Detection
8.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
11 Ratings
9% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.2
37 Ratings
21% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.75 Ratings
8.435 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.04 Ratings
8.036 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.04 Ratings
8.031 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.18 Ratings
8.532 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.76 Ratings
8.131 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.6
21 Ratings
15% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.5
39 Ratings
14% above category average
Production Process Design
9.016 Ratings
8.536 Ratings
Production Management
9.020 Ratings
8.737 Ratings
Configuration Management
9.014 Ratings
8.436 Ratings
Work Execution
9.016 Ratings
8.236 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.020 Ratings
8.533 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
22 Ratings
26% above category average
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
8.2
45 Ratings
14% above category average
Forecasting
9.018 Ratings
8.240 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.021 Ratings
8.243 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.016 Ratings
8.342 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor is an excellent system for most manufacturing customers and offers several features previously only offered on the very large (e.g. Oracle, PeopleSoft, etc) level platforms. Yet the pricing is mid-level, and the expandability through additional modules provides a great opportunity for future business growth. The architecture is easily scalable, fast, and offers great options for both on premise and hosted systems. Epicor is flexible, and large enough that regular updates and enhancements continue to be adopted to improve functionality and effectiveness. It is however, not for everyone. Competition in this sector is very good, with several mid-level systems being available at a similar price point. If you are considering adopting a new ERP system and are in the plastics space, you also owe it to yourself and your team to consider IQMS, which is becoming a de-facto standard in this segment. Also, for specific medical sectors, you will find that Epicor software validation for CFR Part 11 compliance can be quite costly-- although the software is capable of supporting this with modification. Overall, Epicor is a solid choice. Ultimately, it will be up to your team to determine what works best for your needs. You won't be disappointed with Epicor if you do the due diligence and take the time needed to properly review and demo the product. Remember though, demos are typically "best case" staged, so be sure to throw several curveballs at your vendor and bring out the unique requirements of your business.
I think it well suited for organizations with a large and complex infrastructures as it can handle them very easily in my opinion. It is also recommended for companies which are planning to move to mostly automated environments, in which it can be implemented in a good manner. I also think it is not suited or less suited for smaller scale organizations as the cost of operation could exceed the budget.
Epicor has the best product configurator that I have seen on the market. This was one of the main reasons we went with Epicor, and have not been disappointed at all.
Epicor is also one of the easiest ERP system to learn, and has many ways for users to get training. Epicor University, on-line courses, or class room settings, also user conference every year, and user support groups.
The Enterprise search ability in Epicor is great, can find parts, customers, suppliers, etc. so easily. And if you can't remember where a report or task that you want to do is on the menu, you can search for that also.
The software helps in forecasting and identifying potential challenges that would affect our organisation in the near future. This enables us to prepare in advance and also adopt practical and viable measures.
It enables faster and accurate data processing, which enhances decision-making.
It's easily customizable according to specific organizational needs. This promotes overall efficiency and productivity of the organization.
The cost of SAP as an ERP is quite high and the switching costs associated with ERP systems are even higher. That being said moving from one ERP to another only happens once in a great while for large organizations. Those switching costs include retraining, IT hardware requirements, outside consultants and more
I give this rating because the software has good functionality and usability. The system does not crash and can also be maintained under overall conditions in any business function. We utilize this to communicate effectively in various areas and make informed business decisions. This is highly rated as we make other changes to our organization
Day to day data insight is more accurate for manufacturing industry to procure as per forecasted from supplier. Supply and fulfillment cycle becomes more easier. I would say more about performance as we are using this new server so we can see clear difference between SAP S/4HANA Cloud and ECC. Also it has customized business extensions for rapid development.
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
The support system I find great as whenever I run into problems they rectify them quickly as possible they never reacted late the support is just up to the mark for me. They provide many solutions to the problems I faced the [technical] team support is always amazing they [listen] to mean work accordingly.
SAP requires a lot of internal and external resources to complete its successful implementation. The cloud version requires a deeper understanding of the different capabilities of the local systems (hardware) and the connection towards your local IT team. We found several problems on our systems that we couldn't foresee before the implementation and roll out.
Everyone at our organization really appreciated "made 2 manage" because of all of the quick access and some of the capabilities in accounting. So far, Epicor is much more advanced but the two can stand side by side. These two programs cannot really be compared just because it's just not fair to compare an on-site server ERP system to a cloud-based one.
The platform utilizes advanced predictive analytics to anticipate operational bottlenecks and put them out of commission before the problems become larger. We can proactively develop effective strategies that help keep service quality in the face of unexpected changes in the market, or external disruptions, by continuously analyzing historical performance data as well as elements of the current market
The software is pretty easy to use. Things are pretty clear on how to do them and if you don't know how to do something they have instructions on how to do them or you get an error code telling you exactly what to do. I have been satisfied with my overall experience.
The ROI can be hard to quantify. We spend more time setting up and entering information up front, but we spend less time than before trying to track project costs so that evens out. Purchasing the system and implementing it was very expensive, but the benefit is the the better information can save money on projects as we know where best to spend our time and identify potential problems earlier on a project. We believe it will have a positive impact, but I'd say it will take a few years (3-4) to be worth it.