Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.
N/A
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor Kinetic
M1
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor Kinetic
M1
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor Kinetic
M1
Features
Epicor Kinetic
M1
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
13 Ratings
3% above category average
M1
5.6
8 Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
7.713 Ratings
5.38 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.79 Ratings
4.63 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.39 Ratings
7.15 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
27 Ratings
1% below category average
M1
7.0
18 Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
9.025 Ratings
7.615 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.022 Ratings
6.511 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
10% above category average
M1
8.0
27 Ratings
2% below category average
Single sign-on capability
9.031 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.038 Ratings
7.127 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
38 Ratings
22% above category average
M1
6.5
28 Ratings
10% below category average
Dashboards
9.037 Ratings
6.626 Ratings
Standard reports
9.037 Ratings
6.428 Ratings
Custom reports
9.033 Ratings
6.527 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
37 Ratings
2% below category average
M1
6.8
26 Ratings
13% below category average
Accounts payable
9.035 Ratings
6.925 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.036 Ratings
6.826 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.016 Ratings
5.29 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.017 Ratings
8.016 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.020 Ratings
6.421 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.018 Ratings
6.818 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.019 Ratings
7.819 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
37 Ratings
17% above category average
M1
7.0
26 Ratings
12% below category average
Inventory tracking
9.036 Ratings
7.426 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.921 Ratings
6.515 Ratings
Location management
9.029 Ratings
7.121 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.9
40 Ratings
12% above category average
M1
7.3
26 Ratings
7% below category average
Pricing
9.037 Ratings
6.826 Ratings
Order entry
9.040 Ratings
7.326 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.219 Ratings
7.310 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.039 Ratings
7.717 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.916 Ratings
7.513 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
23 Ratings
15% above category average
M1
6.5
21 Ratings
14% below category average
Billing Management
9.018 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.019 Ratings
6.817 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.713 Ratings
4.89 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.914 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Period Close
8.218 Ratings
7.721 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
19 Ratings
19% above category average
M1
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
14 Ratings
9% above category average
M1
5.2
16 Ratings
28% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.612 Ratings
6.216 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.47 Ratings
5.410 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.25 Ratings
4.67 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
7.36 Ratings
4.89 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
7 Ratings
5% above category average
M1
2.7
2 Ratings
94% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
8.03 Ratings
2.72 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
14 Ratings
16% above category average
M1
6.3
18 Ratings
9% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.75 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.04 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.75 Ratings
6.36 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.08 Ratings
5.910 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.011 Ratings
6.218 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
3 Ratings
19% above category average
M1
4.9
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Risk Repository
8.02 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Control Management
8.03 Ratings
5.94 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.02 Ratings
4.84 Ratings
Issue Detection
8.02 Ratings
3.83 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.02 Ratings
3.83 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
11 Ratings
9% above category average
M1
4.0
10 Ratings
50% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.75 Ratings
2.24 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.04 Ratings
2.54 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.04 Ratings
4.73 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.18 Ratings
4.98 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.76 Ratings
5.58 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.6
21 Ratings
15% above category average
M1
6.5
27 Ratings
13% below category average
Production Process Design
9.016 Ratings
6.319 Ratings
Production Management
9.020 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
Configuration Management
9.014 Ratings
6.219 Ratings
Work Execution
9.016 Ratings
7.520 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.020 Ratings
5.926 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
22 Ratings
26% above category average
M1
5.6
20 Ratings
24% below category average
Forecasting
9.018 Ratings
4.714 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.021 Ratings
6.120 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.016 Ratings
5.915 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor is an excellent system for most manufacturing customers and offers several features previously only offered on the very large (e.g. Oracle, PeopleSoft, etc) level platforms. Yet the pricing is mid-level, and the expandability through additional modules provides a great opportunity for future business growth. The architecture is easily scalable, fast, and offers great options for both on premise and hosted systems. Epicor is flexible, and large enough that regular updates and enhancements continue to be adopted to improve functionality and effectiveness. It is however, not for everyone. Competition in this sector is very good, with several mid-level systems being available at a similar price point. If you are considering adopting a new ERP system and are in the plastics space, you also owe it to yourself and your team to consider IQMS, which is becoming a de-facto standard in this segment. Also, for specific medical sectors, you will find that Epicor software validation for CFR Part 11 compliance can be quite costly-- although the software is capable of supporting this with modification. Overall, Epicor is a solid choice. Ultimately, it will be up to your team to determine what works best for your needs. You won't be disappointed with Epicor if you do the due diligence and take the time needed to properly review and demo the product. Remember though, demos are typically "best case" staged, so be sure to throw several curveballs at your vendor and bring out the unique requirements of your business.
The M1 ERP is tailored for small to medium organizations, offering good features at least in the components utilized by my organization such as customizable workflows, user-friendly dashboards, ability to process orders, and track the entire orders lifecycle. It also has good customer interaction features in the CRM part. It provides robust data security, and offers scalable modules to grow with your business. Implementation is not challenging if you don't have so many customizations in the software.
Epicor has the best product configurator that I have seen on the market. This was one of the main reasons we went with Epicor, and have not been disappointed at all.
Epicor is also one of the easiest ERP system to learn, and has many ways for users to get training. Epicor University, on-line courses, or class room settings, also user conference every year, and user support groups.
The Enterprise search ability in Epicor is great, can find parts, customers, suppliers, etc. so easily. And if you can't remember where a report or task that you want to do is on the menu, you can search for that also.
Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
I give this rating because the software has good functionality and usability. The system does not crash and can also be maintained under overall conditions in any business function. We utilize this to communicate effectively in various areas and make informed business decisions. This is highly rated as we make other changes to our organization
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Everyone at our organization really appreciated "made 2 manage" because of all of the quick access and some of the capabilities in accounting. So far, Epicor is much more advanced but the two can stand side by side. These two programs cannot really be compared just because it's just not fair to compare an on-site server ERP system to a cloud-based one.
M1 is light years ahead in overall cost and proficiency. It allows so much more control and flexibility as compared to its competitors. When choosing M1 we went through many demos and M1 was the only ERP that met our needs and still does. We also control our own data which is a big plus for us.
The software is pretty easy to use. Things are pretty clear on how to do them and if you don't know how to do something they have instructions on how to do them or you get an error code telling you exactly what to do. I have been satisfied with my overall experience.
The ROI can be hard to quantify. We spend more time setting up and entering information up front, but we spend less time than before trying to track project costs so that evens out. Purchasing the system and implementing it was very expensive, but the benefit is the the better information can save money on projects as we know where best to spend our time and identify potential problems earlier on a project. We believe it will have a positive impact, but I'd say it will take a few years (3-4) to be worth it.