Epicor iScala vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor iScala
Score 2.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor iScala is business management software for large corporations. Capabilities include financials, supply chain management, light manufacturing, sales, service, rental and lease management.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Pricing
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Features
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Pay calculation7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
API for custom integration8.40 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Plug-ins6.50 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
8.9
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
5.3
Ratings
31% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.2
Ratings
33% below category average
Dashboards3.10 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Standard reports7.30 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Custom reports5.40 Ratings4.90 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
8.1
Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
Ratings
0% below category average
Accounts payable8.20 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.20 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.20 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.20 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.70 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.60 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.60 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.9
Ratings
29% below category average
Inventory tracking8.60 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.20 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Location management7.70 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.7
Ratings
50% below category average
Pricing7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Order entry8.20 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Credit card processing6.40 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.20 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.50 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Billing Management6.70 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.30 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management6.80 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.30 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Period Close7.90 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
13% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting7.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Project Costing8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cost Capture8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance7.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
8.2
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.20 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Supplier Management8.20 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.4
Ratings
21% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization5.80 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.5
Ratings
49% below category average
Production Process Design7.30 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Production Management8.20 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.80 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Work Execution7.80 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.70 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
3.5
Ratings
68% below category average
Forecasting5.40 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.40 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
7.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Proposal Management6.40 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.20 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.7
Ratings
26% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor iScala
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
User Ratings
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor iScalaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for middle-size distributor and service provider.
Read full review
It addresses well some integration and connectivity issues with other software and adapted technologies: formulation and manufacturing batching software, scanners and bar codes, inventory, financials, emailing of invoices and statement, sales and purchasing... etc. I believe it to be better suited to a medium to large company. Not as simple and seamless as we expected for migrating from another Microsoft Dynamics software product (we moved from GP to NAV). Our staff is going through a tougher time than we thought to learn some procedures. Normal growing pains?!
Read full review
Pros
  • Epicor iScala is simple-to-use and robust Microsoft technology based ERP for very wide range of businesses.
  • One of the stronger parts of the solution is using an industry-standard database that is simultaneously secure and open for queries from any BI tool.
  • Interface is simple and modern, easy-to-customize while keeping a stable kernel.
Read full review
  • All of the Dynamics ERP systems are fully integrated with the full family of their Office products (Word, Excel, etc.) but the true power behind Dynamics-NAV is that it comes with complete access to the source code. Although most ERP packages provide some type of a development environment, it is always a third-party software package and requires an additional expense. NAV comes with full source code access and devolvement tools out-of-the-box and requires no additional purchase. The user is able to modify pages, reports and even add additional fields to the standard tables. If your company has an internal development staff you have the ability to purchase the same full development license that the VAR has, allowing you to handle all system customizations and support in-house. The sum total of this high flexibility is that you are able to make NAV conform to your business rather than you conforming to the software.
  • In addition to the available source code, NAV provides the user with an unlimited ability to modify and build within the rich environment of C/AL code. In over 20 years of modifying the NAV product I have never had a client ask for a modification or custom functionality that I was not able to provide. Add to this the fact that NAV now includes many development points that allow the user to place their custom code inside of the system without impacting the base code. This makes the upgrade process quick and easy and avoids the common occurrence of being version locked.
  • The user interface of Dynamics NAV has been well thought out and provides a very easy to learn and use package. Master records (Customer, Vendor, Items, etc.) have been laid out in a standard format. Once you learn where fields are located on one record you have learned them all. The forms (called Pages in NAV) have a very similar structure and, by design, are uncluttered and easily customized by the user without impacting the base code. This allows each user to configure the Page to the way they work, easing the learning process and speeding up daily work and data entry.
  • The NAV environment has grown to be very feature rich in the functionality offered and provides the user with almost everything they need with the purchase of the base product. Advanced features can be added if required as can a large number of third party add-ons made exclusively for the NAV environment. Additionally, user licenses are sold as concurrent and not as named. Concurrent licenses control the number of users allowed into the system at any one time meaning that anyone can be provided with the ability to log into the system. This allows the company to setup an unlimited number of users with the ability to access the system at any given time. This allows the occasional user to share a license with other users who only need to access the system to enter a small amount of data or run a few reports. This functionality is a plus for the company with a large sales staff or outside workers who only need limited access to the system. Named licenses would require that you purchase an access license for every person who needs to access the system.
Read full review
Cons
  • The stock control could use a history view.
  • The integration to other systems can be improved
  • The ability to work on iPad would be nice
Read full review
  • There are not a lot of "out of the box" automation processes, for Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Different versions of NAV, have had various job scheduling functionality. However, each process that is automated, must be confirmed that it will function correctly, in an automatic mode. In our installation, most of the automation processes have been custom-developed.
  • Microsoft Dynamics NAV could have better documentation. Much of the documentation is original, from multiple versions ago. There is generally no step-by-step instructions, on performing various functions. Instead, most help is context-sensitive, obtained by pressing F1, on a particular field.
  • Older versions of Microsoft Dynamics NAV had a built-in WYSIWYG report builder, which made designing reports fairly straight-forward. Later versions (2013 and forward) rely exclusively on Visual Studio and SQL Reporting Services, which require a greater technical level of expertise, to use.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Best in terms of reporting or coming up with a great dashboard. Seamlessly collaborated with teams without depending on particular device as its web version is the buddy for people with work flexibility. Licensing price and integrations can be the areas of improvement and can simplify the interface which will be easy for a new user.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have experience with multiple ERP software and I must say that iScala is the fastest system to work in so far. It doesn't have the same fancy shell like some others but at the end of the day the most important thing is the functionality and here is iScala outstanding.
Read full review
Dynamics fits the modern world, integrating new technology to ensure a complete business process is readily accessible in a rapidly moving world of "in-office" and "remote" work. It solves the need for several departments and streamlines procurement, warehouse, and finance processes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • In comparison with other ERPs iScala has very good cost / functionality ratio
Read full review
  • Better visibility of ROI throughout each period. Orders entered, shipped, and backlogs are very visible to authorized users upon login.
  • Purchasing and inventory turns have been better realized. Out of stock parts reduced.
  • A future customer portal will enhance the customer experience by pulling NAC data into a web-based UI. However, the portal is a separate expense.
  • Time savings realized by being able to generate views or reports versus asking IT or accounting to pull a custom report.
Read full review
ScreenShots