Epicor BisTrack vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor BisTrack
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Epicor BisTrack is business management software for lumber and building materials (LBM) dealers and distributors based on technology acquired with SolarSoft Business Systems in 2012. It covers inventory optimization, delivery dispatch, financial management, customer relationship management, and more recently warehouse management, as well as supplying business analytics.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Features
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.8
Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
Single sign-on capability7.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports6.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
6.3
Ratings
20% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Accounts payable7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking8.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Pricing7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order entry8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
5.0
Ratings
41% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
Plug-ins5.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Billing Management6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
8.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Issue Detection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.2
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Production Process Design7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Forecasting6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor BisTrackMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
Specifically Eipcor comes in handy daily by easily tracking manpower, deliveries, inspections, and other daily tracked items. It is well suited for day to day operations where others can fill in or pick up if somewhere were out of the office. Epicor is less appropriate in providing weekly updates to teams and customers. It is easier to extract the necessary information off of the software to generate your own reports then try to procure one using the software itself.
Read full review
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Cross project communication
  • Direct customers, subcontractors and GC's through the construction process
  • Dynamically move between projects, changes and scopes
Read full review
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Cons
  • Easier User Interface; hard to navigate or learn
  • Financial module could use improvement; i.e. the Accounts Receivable function is lacking and hard to find information easily
  • More customization of the built-in reporting and analytics
Read full review
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
Epicor BisTrack is essential for those in the lumber and building materials industry, especially if they are in the wholesale/distribution side of things. I provided the rating because I feel that BisTrack has contributed a lot for my company and provided with essential information for decision-making on a day-to-day basis. The score also reflects that while BisTrack is an essential software for my business, there is also room for improvement so that the end users will be able to obtain what they need from the software.
Read full review
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apologies, our company's IT department contacts support on our behalf. I have never contacted Epicor BisTrack's support myself; only through my company's IT team.
Read full review
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Epicor BisTrack helps keep track of things better and it in fact much easier to use.
Read full review
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Increased overall efficiency in inventory management by 5%
  • ROI is positive
  • BisTrack provides a way for our business to conduct its day-to-day operations
Read full review
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
ScreenShots