Epicor BisTrack is business management software for lumber and building materials (LBM) dealers and distributors based on technology acquired with SolarSoft Business Systems in 2012. It covers inventory optimization, delivery dispatch, financial management, customer relationship management, and more recently warehouse management, as well as supplying business analytics.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor BisTrack
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor BisTrack
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor BisTrack
Infor VISUAL
Features
Epicor BisTrack
Infor VISUAL
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.8
Ratings
5% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.90 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.90 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
6.3
Ratings
20% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
4% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking
8.80 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.10 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Location management
8.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
Ratings
21% above category average
Pricing
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order entry
8.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.90 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
5.0
Ratings
41% below category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
Plug-ins
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
6.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
Ratings
6% above category average
Infor VISUAL
3.0
Ratings
78% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
Ratings
9% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
8.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Issue Detection
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.2
Ratings
8% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Infor VISUAL
3.2
Ratings
79% below category average
Production Process Design
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Production Management
7.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Work Execution
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
112% below category average
Forecasting
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Project Costing
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Specifically Eipcor comes in handy daily by easily tracking manpower, deliveries, inspections, and other daily tracked items. It is well suited for day to day operations where others can fill in or pick up if somewhere were out of the office. Epicor is less appropriate in providing weekly updates to teams and customers. It is easier to extract the necessary information off of the software to generate your own reports then try to procure one using the software itself.
The original version of Visual Manufacturing (Lilly Software) was intended for mechanical manufacturing. It was adapted at our facility (we were not the first) to accomodate electronic manufacturing. For electronic manufacturing process control it is not ideal when referencing in-line or custom processes used to build product. For material control it is excellent unless a modification to a standard product is required (and we did this on 60% of product going out the door). The co-product feature that removes material from an assembly requires the creator of the work order to calculate the percentage of cost the removed items are from the completed product. On the business operations side regional tax reports were difficult to extract and an external module to go into the data base and extract that had to be created. The system itself was stable for the most part. Occasional "data collisions" corrupted transactions at times. The accounting procedures in place found them by the end of the month .where they were corrected. For a small business with less formal processes Infor Visual can be used with little training for the operators. If the processes need a higher level of accountability and control the processes can be formalized with workflow scripts to ensure that higher level of control.
At times a "shadow part" is necessary in the manufacturing process. This shadow part does not require an inventory transaction but is made a as a separate process - sometimes out of sequence to the general process flow. Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 does not have that capability.
When generating forms for business and manufacturing operations Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 has a limited number of options. To change or add forms requires an unsupported editor. When the stock and custom options are depleted an outside programming module is required as well as programmers to develop the forms.
While free software upgrades to the main operations modules have been part of the maintenance agreement. One upgrade required database and hardware support not justifiable for the current business model. The system was frozen at the current version at that time.
There is no easy way to differentiate between engineering documentation and production documentation.
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Epicor BisTrack is essential for those in the lumber and building materials industry, especially if they are in the wholesale/distribution side of things. I provided the rating because I feel that BisTrack has contributed a lot for my company and provided with essential information for decision-making on a day-to-day basis. The score also reflects that while BisTrack is an essential software for my business, there is also room for improvement so that the end users will be able to obtain what they need from the software.
Apologies, our company's IT department contacts support on our behalf. I have never contacted Epicor BisTrack's support myself; only through my company's IT team.
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.