eola vs. iOS

Indeed, it's super. OS makes it the most feasible item right now on the lookout. It's smooth, and it will not slack even following 3-4 years settling on it. A wise speculation choice for an innovation.

Incentivized

• User experience is consistent
• Updates to the operating system and apps are seamless and unobtrusive.
• The Messages app for communications is secure and safe from prying eyes.

Incentivized

• Some of the security features can get in the way of organizational management, requiring careful consideration of the configuration.
• There are a lot of design choices that are consumer-first that you have to work around with institutionally-owned devices.
• There are some hard limitations, like apps not having direct access to network interfaces for WiFi scans.

Incentivized

In all likelihood, common users will either already have experience with iOS on their iPhones, or will pick it up quickly. The UI is generally simple and mostly visual. Power users, on the other hand, may feel constrained by the inherent limitations built-in. Root access, terminal commands, and deep customization are not really to be found here.

Incentivized

Lots of help articles online for just about everything under the sun. I have never personally had to engage Apple's support team to comment on their helpfulness.

Incentivized

iOS is way beyond Android in terms of centralized management. It is way more fleshed out in terms of features, and Android management has all but been abandoned at this point. iOS is still behind Chrome OS, particularly in an educational setting, but there are genuine tradeoffs that might make it a better fit for a given organization, and in fact, we do regularly deploy both iOS and Chrome OS devices.

Incentivized

• Positive as far as cellular usage, phone tracking, and security for our users.
• Negative as far as battery replacement on older phones.
• Costs would be similar to android phones so security/simplicity is our main point here.

Incentivized