eMaint CMMS vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
eMaint CMMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
eMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.
$69
per month per user
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Pricing
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Editions & Modules
Team
$69
per month per user
Professional
$85
per month per user
Enterprise
$120
per month per user
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
User Ratings
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
This program is great to track equipment or machinery especially at multiple locations. Can be also used to work with vendors.
Read full review
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Pros
  • A software program that is configurable which can meet many different needs. Basically, you can customize the CMMS to meet your specific needs.
  • Easy to learn and use.
  • Listening to customer needs. As more people are using this software, things are identified to make improvements which eMaint does well at providing updates.
Read full review
  • Tracks machine maintenance costs.
  • Keeps preventative maintenance work orders on track.
  • Keeps history of all past work orders for review in case a problem you've already dealt with comes up again.
Read full review
Cons
  • Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
  • QR code functionality.
  • Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.
Read full review
  • Mobile App - They are improving as i type this
  • Simplified Mobile app for requester only. Not everyone needs the full CMMS
  • Notifications of comments on completed work orders - In case I don't see a comment
Read full review
Support Rating
Never had a good beginning from the start. We are just dreading using this because we paid for it.
Read full review
Customer support for Hippo CMMS has always been extremely friendly and helpful. They are quick to respond to even the simplest need.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
Read full review
We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous system, and the customer support is much better.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved time, energy, and money by digitally handling all maintenance and customer info.
  • Could not be easily integrated with other software.
Read full review
  • Overall Hippo has had a positive impact. The annual cost is low, and the equipment has better OEE due to better maintenance due to better tracking.
  • It is easy to justify labor based on planned work and completed work. It is easy to assess the workload.
  • Maintaining equipment increases production. This is a good tool for keeping equipment in good working order.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of