EGroupware vs. Miro
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EGroupware | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | EGroupware is more than a standard groupware: Web-based: allows device-independent access via web browser Configurable and customisable masks. User-defined fields Information can be used as variables in document generation or in e-mails Generated documents can be edited in online office, sent by e-mail or shared via file sharing Permissions on modules, functions, data, ressources, other user data, to ensure secure data Access can be… | N/A |
Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
| EGroupware | Miro | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There are pricing models for active users and concurrent logins. In addition, the prices are scaled according to the number of users and special agreements (also flat rates) are possible. Rocket.Chat is offered at an annual flat rate. Collabora Online per user. Discounts for NGOs, schools and universities. | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| EGroupware | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 5762 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Delivers good value for the price 3761 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Happy with the feature set 5798 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 2278 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 2430 Answers | |
| EGroupware | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Flock Score9.1 out of 10 | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Microsoft Viva Engage Score7.8 out of 10 | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Keep Score9.9 out of 10 | Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| EGroupware | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.5 |
| Usability | - | 9.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.8 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.5 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 7.9 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.8 |
| EGroupware | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | EGroupware Screenshots | Miro Screenshots |









