EGrAMS vs. Submittable
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EGrAMS | Score1 out of 10 | N/A | EGrAMS is a web-based, configurable, and scalable solution that promises to automate, simplify, and streamline grants administration and management, while also improving transparency and accountability. The vendor says EGrAMS supports all functional areas of the grant life cycle from planning through closeout and grant programs can be easily and quickly implemented. Here's the vendor's main value proposition and the pain point the product solves for: Grants administration and… | N/A |
Submittable | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days. | $10,000 per year |
| EGrAMS | Submittable | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| EGrAMS | Submittable | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Would buy again 74 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Delivers good value for the price 61 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Happy with the feature set 73 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 55 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Implementation went as expected 61 Answers | |
| EGrAMS | Submittable | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Blackbaud Grantmaking Score9 out of 10 | Blackbaud Grantmaking Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Submittable Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| EGrAMS | Submittable | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.9 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| In-Person Training | - | 8.1 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Configurability | - | 7.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 8.3 |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 9.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.0 |
| EGrAMS | Submittable | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Professional Services | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |

