eGrabber Hiring Prospector (resumegrabber) vs. hireEZ

[eGrabber Hiring Prospector (resumegrabber)] a great tool to speed up your processing time when you are uploading resumes. It allows for [seamless] transitioning for sourcing to calling but the caveat is sometimes the formatting can be wonky on a resume and you need someone to manual check each batch of resumes you source. The great thing is is work of a wide array of formats[.]

Incentivized

hireEZ is well suited to small to midsize companies in my experience. For companies with minimal budget they will negotiate better terms for a longer contract. You also control the number of seats you pay for and the type. It is basically a la carte pricing.

• Makes process faster
• Breaks apart information 90% accurate

Incentivized

• Talent sourcing aggregate (known by Hiretual as AI Sourcing).
• Custom insights based on search criteria.
• Contact information & social link retrieval.
• Applicant Tracking System Integration -- At OnPoint we use Lever as our ATS. Hiretual allows us to export candidate data directly into our ATS and associate said candidates to a specific requisition, & in a specific stage.

• 10% of the time info in wrong places

Incentivized

• I have come across many duplicate profiles that could cause me to contact the same person twice in a short period.
• Doesn’t have an “undo” button for if I accidentally mark a candidate as “not a good fit”
• Their “variables” used in creating email templates don’t function optimally. If you use “candidate last name”, and the person has a title, it will use the title instead of name. For example… I sent an email to a doctor and it sent as “Dr. MD”. Not ideal.

Incentivized

The benefits of a larger universe of candidates and automating recognition of talent we cannot hire, hireEZ has been a big time saver just as a sourcing tool

I am a user of three years and have seen the features grow over time. I love how responsive the team is when there is an issue and their willingness to work towards a feature request is unmatched. I also find the accuracy of the data is comparable if not better than most competitors

Both my account representative and the founding partner have reached out to me proactively to offer assistance and my account manager has been very responsive on the rare occasions when I have required assistance. I would highly recommend Hiretual to recruiters if they are "over" LinkedIn. It is a terrific tool!

Incentivized

These products are pretty similar exception being that [eGrabber Hriring Prospector (resumegrabber)] allows for a much wider array of applications. Daxtra's algorithm is better, but [eGrabber Hiring Prospector (resumegrabbber)] can be used in more places. The failure rate is about the same in all three of these products, and the cost varies greatly because there are some many al la carte options[.]

Incentivized

I think they are very similar but different in their own right. LinkedIn Recruiter is what most of grew our careers on and are familiar with. The negative with them is there really has not been many updates with them over the years and it seems their system is getting less reliable every day with crashes or glitches. hireEZ has constantly done updates and added new features that make the experience better for the user. Also the functionalities are different and useful for what we do at our company.

• It saves us a few hundred a week in manual processing time a reduces human error

Incentivized

• The deployment of Hiretual allowed us to reduce our spend via LinkedIn (as it sources from LinkedIn) by 6 figures. It's been a game changer.
• Some of our projects on Hiretual have been so successful that we've been able to close out hard to fill roles much faster than the benchmark for those roles.
• Hiretual is not just a vendor for us, it is also a key partner and trusted advisor.

Incentivized