Eclipse OpenJ9 vs. OpenText Documentum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Eclipse OpenJ9
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenJ9 from the Eclipse Foundation (contributed by IBM) is a JVM optimized to run Java applications cost-effectively in the cloud.N/A
OpenText Documentum
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
Pricing
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Features
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Eclipse OpenJ9
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
9.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Small Businesses
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.7 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.7 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Eclipse OpenJ9OpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
The CLOUD development integrating web applications with web databases definitely needs a fast and memory-efficient platform like Eclipse OpenJ9. The garbage collector and SHARED CLASSES between processes make possible a fast response to the web client and API requests. Eclipse OpenJ9 needs better documentation to explain to the programmers the advantages over other JAVA implementations like HotSpot.
Read full review
What are the document volume, the throughput - currently and expected in year, 3 years etc.? Is the company doing content management on international level, where access from multiple locations is needed - then Documentum can be good investment. What ECM system will be used for - document storage, document lifecycle or retention? Or all of the above? - Documentum works very well if all 3 items are combined, yet for storage there must be cheaper and more easily adaptable solutions available.
Read full review
Pros
  • Faster startup
  • Memory administration
  • Shared CLASSES between processes
Read full review
  • It's good at integration with external systems through standard industry supported APIs, including but not limited to web services integration and file system integration.
  • Good support from major up and downstream technologies such as image capturing and back end ERP, Database, and HR.
  • Highly configurable.
  • Very fast searching capabilities.
  • Highly scalable.
Read full review
Cons
  • Marketing to promote the advantages it provides for the CLOUD.
  • Documentation to used its garbage collector effectively.
  • Documentation to implement the SHARED CLASESS between processes and understand the advantages.
Read full review
  • Expense. If Documentum costs less it would penetrate more markets. This is often the reason a lighter weight solution is chosen.
  • Web Publishing. Documentum is not a great solution for replacing CMSs like SiteCore or Drupal. Probably better as an archiving target for parallel publishing to both web and Documentum. Documentum is also not a web hosting solution like some other systems, it is possible to try and consume directly from the repository in real time but it is better to push web content out and consume from another platform.
  • Development. The price of broad functionality is complexity. Arguably, Documentum drank the kool-aid and tried to become like other enterprise solutions by adapting Java, Windows, etc. in the late '90s and it made them slower, more complex in design, and less stable. They recovered from that but it still requires developers with a few years of experience in Documentum to safely develop in Documentum. The issue is not knowing Java but knowing what to do or not do in an ECM system. This is even more important in regulated ECM/RM systems.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM released the Eclipse OpenJ9 under the Eclipse Foundation and open source thinking about the need for CLOUD development efficiency. Eclipse OpenJ9 could be more suitable if want to develop an API with cloud databases like MariaDB using AWS. The memory management of Eclipse OpenJ9 makes the web performance of API faster. The capacity to run shared CLASSES in a memory partition between processes gives Eclipse OpenJ9 a design advantage over other JAVA SDK platforms.
Read full review
Subjective but here's how I see it: Heavy duty (in order of how much they can do and how much they can handle): 1)Documentum, 2)FileNet 3)OpenText Middle duty: 1)WCC-WebCenter Content, 2)Alfresco, 3)M-Files (3rd b/c it is Windows only), 4)Nuxeo (only b/c of its newish approach that may lead somewhere) Light duty: 1) BOX (not an ECM but it says it is), 2) EFSS (pick your poison, BOX is an enhanced EFSS), 3) CMSs (some have some ECM capability, none have much)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Open Source Alternative to Oracle JDK supported by IBM.
  • Excellent performance for CLOUD development for APIs.
  • Multiplatform (LInux, Windows) Java SDK that runs in a container like Docker.
Read full review
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots