eClincher aims to be the most powerful, complete and intuitive social media management software. According to the vendor, the product is designed to help users, businesses, and agencies manage social media presence with one platform, and offers the following capabilities: advanced publishing publishing automation (queues, RSS feeds, recycle evergreen content) engagement with unified social inbox & live social feeds monitoring content…
$149
per month
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$0
per month per user
Pricing
eClincher
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Standard
$149
per month
Professional
$349
per month
Enterprise
Contact Vendor
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eClincher
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
A discount is offered for annual billing.
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eClincher
Wrike
Features
eClincher
Wrike
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Boolean keyword searches
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Broad channel coverage
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
6.0
Ratings
29% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Content planning and scheduling
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience targeting
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content optimization
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
6.3
Ratings
23% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
4.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk actions
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
1.0
Ratings
154% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Lead generation
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content marketing
1.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
6.8
Ratings
21% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Twitter
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Facebook
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
LinkedIn
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Google+
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instagram
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pinterest
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
YouTube
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
4.0
Ratings
66% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Campaign success analytics
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Real-time tracking
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
4.5
Ratings
56% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions & privileges
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile access
1.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
eClincher
-
Ratings
Wrike
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
If you are on a tight budget and sick of comparable options, this is the ideal solution. For an incredibly reasonable price, this can do everything I need to manage social media for a handful of mobile apps simultaneously. If you have infinite money, handle massive brands, and harbor huge expectations for powerful social media tools, you should go with one of the pricier options. But keep in mind, this will end up being the difference between $99 USD a month, and $3,000 USD a month. You need to really decide what you need before making that leap because, in the mobile world, it's often the case that money like that is best allocated elsewhere.
Negotiations often involve long timelines and multiple rounds of discussion. Wrike allows us to assign clear ownership, track due dates, and monitor progress so that nothing stalls or gets lost. Redlines, proposals, and finalized agreements can be stored and shared within Wrike, reducing reliance on scattered email chains and ensuring everyone is working from the most current version.
We use eClincher to schedule posts and reply to messages on various social platforms.
The platform compiles all of the social outlets so that we can see and reply to all outlets in the same dashboard.
The reporting is wonderful! Easy to generate and easy for clients to read.
There are so many outlets to post your message, the more on one platform the better. There are a couple of things that we've requested from eClincher and they've always been able to deliver.
different views to accommodate different users workflow
predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
It's not very visually appealing, but this is not a dealbreaker.
The reporting features could definitely use some work. I still get more value from the native SNS pages, but this is quickly changing. They removed the "export to CSV" functionality, but they plan to reintroduce it soon. As mentioned previously, they really respond to criticism well and update the tool constantly.
The inbox could use some work. I don't like being directed offsite to view certain comments deemed "requests for further info" when they could just easily display them there.
For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
Importing.
Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
Unless the price of eClincher moves to a point where it is too much to justify, I don't see any reason why we wouldn't continue to use eClincher for our agency. The value at this price-point is unbelievable and we'd be foolish to move to a pricier program purely for the sake of slicker graphics or UI. eClinchers pricing is fantastic, and is only matched by its functionality—it matches or beats any of the major Social Media Manager SaaS programs out there for a fraction of the cost. This tool is great for growing agencies, but would also be useful for any marketing department or large agency that wants to streamline their social media workflow.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Its usability was good until they changed their plans and stopped their LTD program for its early adopters who helped raise the tool by giving it positive reviews. I don't think eClincher is ethical in any sense based on the recent actions.
I love the way task management is designed within Wrike. The full overview, followed by sequential updates, really works for us - this way, we don't need to go into individual people's work subtasks to find what's happening with a project. That's very useful from a project management perspective. The to-do feature also lets everyone access info in one place.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
[In my experience,] due to the fact that they did a bait and switch on their plans and blamed AppSumo for the lifetime program ending is simply wrong. [I believe that] it's unethical to get support and reviews from their early adopters then take the plan away later.
We've had so many questions during the establishment of Wrike for our team, and the Wrike support team has exceeded our expectations. Our team is naturally curious, and the Wrike support team has always been willing to hold conversations about how we can make an idea work, to show us hidden features that delight us, and to help us plan ways to build out projects efficiently. They meet our questions with multiple solutions and best practices
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Be patient. eClincher isn't perfect and has some software issues. These issues will be exacerbated if you get frustrated or have a slow connection. If something "breaks" or locks up, just refresh the page and re-do that step. It may take your team a couple weeks to get use to using the new system. Once they've gotten the hang of it, I'm sure they'll love the amount of time they save. I'd recommend taking your time with the set-up. Though there aren't a lot of steps to get everything squared away, you can break the process into small chunks to make sure you're managing your time. To just hook-up all the social accounts, it may only take an hour or so. But, if you want to set-up all the extra tools (such as user accounts, listening feeds, posting groups, schedules, etc.) it'll take longer. I think it took around a day to set-up completely, but your mileage my vary.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
I used Sprout in a past life and while it does have some more features and might be a bit more aesthetically pleasing and a tad more intuitive, it doesn't have the queues feature eClincher has, and it is much more expensive. The only feature I miss from Sprout really is the customer history feature.
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
Wrike has significantly enhanced our workflow and productivity, ensuring accuracy and efficiency meet high standards. Our work now reflects professionalism and top quality. Other departments have taken notice of how organized we are thanks to Wrike, and we take great pride in our work—all made possible by this platform
Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.