Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQ
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQ
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQ
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Features
Ridder iQ
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
6.10 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Plug-ins
5.80 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
Single sign-on capability
7.70 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.10 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.2
Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.30 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.40 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
6.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.80 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.20 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.60 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.40 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.20 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Inventory tracking
6.30 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Location management
5.30 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing
7.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order entry
7.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.30 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.60 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Billing Management
7.40 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
4.80 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
4.70 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Period Close
5.60 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
5.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
6.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
5.40 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
23% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.90 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management
5.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
30% above category average
Risk Repository
4.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Control Management
5.30 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
4.80 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.80 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Transportation Execution Management
6.40 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.20 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Production Process Design
7.90 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Production Management
7.40 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.80 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Work Execution
7.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.20 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
25% above category average
Forecasting
6.20 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
5.90 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.1
Ratings
16% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Proposal Management
5.80 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
6.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
20% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Sales Ledger. Currently, the idea behind the sales ledger module is that the company prepares a sales order for another company. I would prefer the developers consider the scenario where a sales order is prepared for the same company but for another branch or unit.
Postings of issues items are currently possible but none of the modules caters to "departmental material or item request". Further tweaks have been done on our Project Module to cater for this but it's not entirely perfect. This will enable aid in cost allocation per departmental request of materials or items.
Challenges with the bank module - does not allow for easily reconciliation as the statement from the banks can not be uploaded except for specific format.
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Cost and local regional compliance were primary factors in chosing Microsoft Dynamics AX over SAP Access Control for our need. SAP AC would have provided easier integration into our primary ERP system SAP but there were some regional compliance with ASEAN countries as well as the cost of implementation was more over Microsoft Dynamics AX.