Ridder iQ vs. M1

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.N/A
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQM1
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQM1
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQM1
Features
Ridder iQM1
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
M1
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
API for custom integration6.10 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Plug-ins5.80 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
M1
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Single sign-on capability7.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.20 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
M1
6.6
Ratings
9% below category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Standard reports6.40 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Custom reports8.40 Ratings6.60 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
M1
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Accounts payable6.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.80 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Global Financial Support5.90 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.70 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Configurable Accounting6.40 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.20 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
M1
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
Inventory tracking6.30 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.10 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Location management5.30 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
M1
7.4
Ratings
6% below category average
Pricing7.90 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Order entry7.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.30 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
M1
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
Billing Management7.40 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management6.10 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management4.70 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting4.70 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Period Close5.60 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
21% below category average
M1
5.3
Ratings
25% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling5.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers6.10 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools5.40 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings4.60 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
29% below category average
M1
6.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared4.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring5.10 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Contract Repository4.20 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated5.90 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management6.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
M1
5.0
Ratings
26% below category average
Risk Repository4.50 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Control Management5.30 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments4.80 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection4.70 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings3.90 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
M1
4.0
Ratings
50% below category average
Transportation Execution Management6.40 Ratings2.50 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.30 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings2.20 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
M1
6.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Production Process Design8.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Production Management7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.80 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Work Execution7.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
M1
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Forecasting6.20 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.50 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.90 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
M1
4.4
Ratings
47% below category average
Proposal Management5.70 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Product Master Data Management6.40 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
M1
5.7
Ratings
23% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings4.60 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
M1
2.7
Ratings
92% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings2.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ridder iQM1
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ridder iQM1
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ridder iQM1
Likelihood to Recommend
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Implementation is by far the weakest link in the ECI/M1 process. Although the tool is powerful, the client is expected to drive the process of learning the tool, planning the meetings with consultants, identifying risks and making mitigation plans, etc. without any samples, guidance or assistance on the part of ECI. The tool is best suited to high volume, standard product manufacturers who build to inventory or to order without much variation. The shop floor routing and time tracking are straightforward if you can master the convoluted Unit Of Measure calculations. The tool is either hosted locally or accessed through Remote Desktop. Shop floor is web enabled but the main desktop for M1 is still a relay which makes connectivity a potential issue. Moving this platform to a truly web hosted environment would substantially improve connectivity and eliminate compatibility issues with Apple products
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility in setting budgets for specific parts of a project
  • Insight in costs (journaldetails)(bookkeeping, however not Ridder financials)
  • Sending out offers and order confirmation
  • sending out purchase orders
  • Flexibiliteit bij het vaststellen van budgetten voor specifieke onderdelen van een project
  • Inzicht in kosten (journaalgegevens) (boekhouding, echter geen Ridder financials)
  • Het versturen van offertes en orderbevestigingen
  • het versturen van inkooporders
Read full review
  • Manage inventory counts. Good precision on quantities in and out, through shipping, MI, MR, and receipts.
  • Job costing shows great details on labor, operations, and materials to be used. I wished that would do better in outside operations that would return, but we still think it is great.
  • Ability to track changes (changelog), showing all changes that had in a particular place. Such as where, when, and by whom a line item unit price was changed in a PO.
  • Link, traceability, keeping history. If done correctly, it is amazing to keep the history of a part/lot.
  • The amount of user rights/customization is unbelievable. It can be hard to set up in the beginning, but it is great that you can give some very specific access to a user, and it is not (in general) as a package.
Read full review
Cons
  • The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
  • Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
  • De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
  • Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een ​​kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Read full review
  • Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
  • We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
  • Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Read full review
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
Read full review
Support Rating
Expert level of the support engineers is adequate. However in our opinion it does take a fair amount of time to respond
Read full review
Support has been great and timely
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I didn't work here yet at the time of the implementation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Read full review
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more natural. SAP Services is usually more expensive compared to M1.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Implement the business rules and forces them to be applied
  • SDK is used 90% for managing all order inputs and product BOM
  • The software tends to come to an halt for changes for on premise which is required of you have software/machines communicating to/from the ERP
  • Implementeer de bedrijfsregels en zorg ervoor dat ze worden toegepast
  • SDK wordt voor 90% gebruikt voor het beheren van alle orderinputs en product-BOM
  • De software loopt vaak vast bij wijzigingen voor on-premises, wat vereist dat u software/machines hebt die met het ERP communiceren
Read full review
  • Time savings having to only enter certain information once and have it follow through the entire order process from quote to cash
Read full review
ScreenShots

Ridder iQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Ridder IQ combines the knowledge and practical experience gained since 1982 and is built on the latest software techniques such as .NET, C# and Microsoft SQL.Screenshot of Ridder IQ includes a complete CRM system with integration to Exchange and Outlook, purchase, sales, stock and time administration, as well as document management systems, integrated report designer and an authorization system.

M1 Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of