Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.
N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQ
M1
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQ
M1
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQ
M1
Features
Ridder iQ
M1
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
M1
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
API for custom integration
6.10 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Plug-ins
5.80 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
M1
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Single sign-on capability
7.70 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.20 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
M1
6.6
Ratings
9% below category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Standard reports
6.40 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom reports
8.40 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
M1
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Accounts payable
6.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.80 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.90 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.20 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.70 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.40 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.20 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
M1
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
Inventory tracking
6.30 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.10 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Location management
5.30 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
M1
7.4
Ratings
6% below category average
Pricing
7.90 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Order entry
7.70 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.30 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.60 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
M1
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
Billing Management
7.40 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.10 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
4.70 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
4.70 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Period Close
5.60 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
21% below category average
M1
5.3
Ratings
25% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
5.00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
6.10 Ratings
5.40 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
5.40 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
29% below category average
M1
6.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.90 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.10 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.20 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.90 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
M1
5.0
Ratings
26% below category average
Risk Repository
4.50 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Control Management
5.30 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
4.80 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.70 Ratings
3.80 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
3.90 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
M1
4.0
Ratings
50% below category average
Transportation Execution Management
6.40 Ratings
2.50 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.30 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
2.20 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
5.50 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
M1
6.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Production Process Design
8.00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Production Management
7.40 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.80 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Work Execution
7.50 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.20 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
M1
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Forecasting
6.20 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.50 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
5.90 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
M1
4.4
Ratings
47% below category average
Proposal Management
5.70 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
6.40 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
M1
5.7
Ratings
23% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Implementation is by far the weakest link in the ECI/M1 process. Although the tool is powerful, the client is expected to drive the process of learning the tool, planning the meetings with consultants, identifying risks and making mitigation plans, etc. without any samples, guidance or assistance on the part of ECI. The tool is best suited to high volume, standard product manufacturers who build to inventory or to order without much variation. The shop floor routing and time tracking are straightforward if you can master the convoluted Unit Of Measure calculations. The tool is either hosted locally or accessed through Remote Desktop. Shop floor is web enabled but the main desktop for M1 is still a relay which makes connectivity a potential issue. Moving this platform to a truly web hosted environment would substantially improve connectivity and eliminate compatibility issues with Apple products
Manage inventory counts. Good precision on quantities in and out, through shipping, MI, MR, and receipts.
Job costing shows great details on labor, operations, and materials to be used. I wished that would do better in outside operations that would return, but we still think it is great.
Ability to track changes (changelog), showing all changes that had in a particular place. Such as where, when, and by whom a line item unit price was changed in a PO.
Link, traceability, keeping history. If done correctly, it is amazing to keep the history of a part/lot.
The amount of user rights/customization is unbelievable. It can be hard to set up in the beginning, but it is great that you can give some very specific access to a user, and it is not (in general) as a package.
The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more natural. SAP Services is usually more expensive compared to M1.