DupeCatcher vs. ZoomInfo Operations

If you often get lead lists for import, large databases, a lot of users manipulating data regularly, then this is very necessary. Otherwise, I wouldn't see a huge need. I will say that we have found more cost effective apps that have a little more what we need as far as customization and more features.

Incentivized

The contact enrichment feature adds missing contact info, like emails or phone numbers. It also allows us to confirm that the address information on our CRM matches what Zoom says. I wish more emails were available within the service, but what you can glean from Zoom makes marketing to the correct personas much easier.

Incentivized

• User friendly & easy to navigate. I don't have a lot of time to learn brand new processes, so the ease of dupecatcher saved me a lot of time that I would normally spend hours doing manual work, merging duplicates.
• "Ignore" some apps don't allow you to ignore dupes, as some may know this is absolutely necessary sometimes.
• Alerts that notify SF users when they are creating duplicates.

Incentivized

• EverString allows us to build account lists based off in-depth firmographic or technographic data. It's far more accurate than trying to build these lists any other way.
• EverString is fast. Where it might've previously taken us weeks to build lists of this quality, we now can build them in a matter of minutes (and have them ready to be published in a couple of hours).

Incentivized

• While it is user friendly, the interface could use a facelift. Very old school looking.
• Sometimes it will flag false duplicate results.
• Mass delete option is not available, and would be very useful.

Incentivized

• Contacts underneath Companies can be outdated by 4+ years (left employer years prior).
• Customer support is not as engaged as a smaller software company might be. Delays in solving issues.
• Limits in sharing lists, queries, and tags between users under the same account.

Incentivized

Would love to keep everstring as part of our tech stack in the future. if we ever have to move from everstring it will be due to budget not the solution itself.

Incentivized

Usability is among the highest I have ever worked within an application of this magnitude. It was a significant recession for us and our sales team along with some of our onboarding folks have been able to use the tool as well. Other are able to benefit as well that are outside of the sales team but I do get as much of their feedback as I do from the sales team.

Incentivized

No problems

Incentivized

Had very good experience when using it

Incentivized

Quick response and quick resolution.

Incentivized

It was helpful

Incentivized

Have a plan on how you're going to evaluate. We had a two-month trial period, but a six-month average lead cycle time, making it impossible to evaluate on a purely new-business ROI basis within the trial. We applied the model to our prior data, which demonstrated how much time and effort was devoted to accounts that weren't going to close

Incentivized

We had DupeCatcher first, but did demo a few other similar products and decided to go with a different product due to the fact that they had a lot more features, customization, and excellent customer service.

Incentivized

I haven't tried stacking it against any competition as I feel no need to. ZoomInfo blows me away like it first did in 2018, and I don't want something different. I hear Clay is good, but I just haven't felt the need to try it out or replace ZoomInfo at all.

Incentivized

Hasn’t experienced any issues to doubt reliability

Incentivized

• Any tool that can catch duplicates is something almost any CRM using company needs. So obviously this will always have a positive impact on a company.
• I wouldn't say we had a negative impact but we were able to find tools that did what DupeCatcher does and them some with a higher price tag, but you get a lot more features, and in my opinion what you would want/need/expect out of a dupe catcher.

Incentivized

• The rate we close prospects run through Zoom products is up 10% on average
• The time to close a prospect has been reduced by one calendar week (about 5%)
• The time spent reviewing prospects has shrunk from 1-2 hours a week to 5-10 minutes which is HUGE.