Dropbox DocSend vs. IMS Platform

It's super great for sharing sales collateral, investor pitch slide decks, and other one-time viewing content. It's mainly built for sales but has been a huge benefit as a small startup. It best for PDF content that is okay to be horizontally oriented and scrolled (e.g. the forward and back buttons are on the side of the viewing interface).

Incentivized

In our specific use case we used IMS to manage the investor acquisition process and manage reporting going forward. Basically, it's a powerful, real-estate focused CRM that understands our pain points and issues. Additionally, it was cost efficient for our organization since we weren't using any of the waterfall technology, nor did we have extensive complicated ownership structures that we needed to import. We were essentially starting from the beginning, with very few implementation needs. In this situation, the software worked perfectly. We have been very happy with the service and technology. That said, if you have an extensive investor relations apparatus and need something that requires a tremendous amount of implementation (i.e. an entire, existing, investor management system) it may be a more difficult process

Incentivized

• Additional information from users who have already downloaded the files or material.
• Additional information if the download link(s) have been resent.
• Password encryption if necessary.
• Email verification for third-party download via email.
• Add-ons with other platforms and applications, such as Outlook and Gmail.
• Seal of documents by electronic signature

Incentivized

• Investor Management
• K-1 Distribution
• New Investment Pages
• Clear Dashboards
• Customer Support

Incentivized

• Customer support is an area that is possible to improve, providing an [quick] answer.
• [Providing] more details about how to interact with the tool, in some cases, is complicated for new users to understand and start to use the program.
• The collaboration feature can be improved to allow users to have a better experience using the tool and interacting.

Incentivized

• Confusing UI (Hard to Use)
• Implementation Issues
• Missing Functionality

Incentivized

I haven’t used the support as our internal teams do a great job of fixing and supporting our DocSend use.

Incentivized

Our organization previously used ClearSlide but switched to DocSend as a cost savings. It was not made clear during the sales process that DocSend does not natively possess audio conferencing or screen-share capabilities. We had to add on the join.me integration after the fact, which has not worked well. When our contract is up with DocSend we will be moving back to ClearSlide

Incentivized

We evaluated IMS against Juniper Square and the Crowdstreet white label platform. IMS came to the top for us because of our specific use case (i.e. less implementation needs, primarily investor acquisition and investor management). Also, at the time, IMS was way more cost effective for the functionality that was offered compared to its immediate competitors

Incentivized

• For about $100 you can optimize all
• Of your pipelines that rely on decks or documents - worth it!
• The time you’d spend having to send each link to individual clients without tracking is well worth the $100 on the product
• We’ve been able to close our fundraising round and increase partnerships by utilizing DocSend - would recommend!

Incentivized

• Increased investor acquisition
• Increase investor engagement
• Saved significant time in managing investor
• Massive time savings in K-1 distribution
• High quality investor reporting system

Incentivized