D&B Risk Analytics vs. Dow Jones Risk & Compliance

It would be great to make National ID as mandatory info when adding a company into the D&B Risk Analytics database.

It is particularly well-suited for financial institutions and other organizations in heavily regulated industries, such as banks and money service businesses that need to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations, as well as organizations with a high volume of transactions. The product offers features such as watchlist screening, real-time monitoring, intelligence and research, automated workflows, reporting and visualization and easy integration with other systems. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller organizations with a lower risk profile or limited budget, or organizations with relatively simple compliance requirements

Incentivized

• Robust insight on financial health.
• Continuous monitoring & alerts.
• Predictive measurers that are quantifiable.

• Finding the correct entity in D&B. There are usually tons of D&B #s for one entity.
• ESG ratings still need work.
• We are still determining internally what the best practice is for these financial health ratings. What does it mean for us?

D&B Risk Analytics contains all information I need to do my job well and has a daily updated scores to reflect the financial situation.

I am not sure. We also use Bitsight for cybersecurity, but I do not personally use it, so I cannot say.

• We have had the solution for less than a year, so it is tough to say how much positive/negative impact it has had.
• We are now able to continuously monitor some entities in our supplier base. We were not able to do this before.