Divi vs. Netlify CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Divi
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
More than just a WordPress theme, Divi is a website building platform that replaces the standard WordPress post editor with a new visual editor. The vendor states it can be enjoyed by design professionals and newcomers alike, and is designed to give users the ability to create spectacular designs with ease and efficiency.
$89
per year
Netlify CMS
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Netlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.N/A
Pricing
DiviNetlify CMS
Editions & Modules
Divi
$89
per year
Divi Pro
$277
per year
Divi Lifetime + Pro Services
$297
today + 212 each following year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DiviNetlify CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsLifetime subscriptions are also available for a one time fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DiviNetlify CMS
Features
DiviNetlify CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Divi
7.9
Ratings
2% below category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Divi
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Netlify CMS
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API7.40 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Divi
8.8
Ratings
13% above category average
Netlify CMS
6.1
Ratings
23% below category average
WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness9.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Admin section8.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Page templates9.10 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Library of website themes8.70 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design9.60 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form generator6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Divi
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Netlify CMS
4.3
Ratings
52% below category average
Content taxonomy7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SEO support8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions8.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Community / comment management7.60 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DiviNetlify CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DiviNetlify CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DiviNetlify CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Divi has cornered the market on a simple, straightforward WordPress theme that gives some major integrations and functions! Now that I've worked within it for years, I have a much better understanding of how robust a system it is. It takes some practice to get accustomed to but once you "get" it, it is so fun to use. I've shown so many small business owners how to use Divi and I feel that it is much easier to learn than other themes with functions that are controlled by coding or shortcodes. I could play in Divi all day, and some days I do, depending on which projects I am working on at the time
Read full review
Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
Read full review
Pros
  • Front end builder easy to design
  • Exportable and importable layouts and templates
  • Integration with wordpress and many plugins
  • Individual template builder to apply to certain post types
  • Add on cloud to store and sync your own designs, code snippets
  • Can create your own api licenses for different websites
Read full review
  • Storing content data in customized schema without a database
  • Full control over your content and infrastructure where it is deployed and stored
  • Very low-cost way for building your own CMS and CDN
Read full review
Cons
  • Some advanced features need to be complemented with other paid plugins (e.g., attachments in contact forms)
  • Certain Divi elements cannot be nested within other Divi elements (e.g., including an element within an accordion)
  • Customizing the header is powerful, but making the most of it is more challenging than the rest of Divi's options
Read full review
  • Linking between different schema types, i.e. having some relations between content
  • Better ways to define content schema, like how TinaCMS would handle using a JSON
Read full review
Usability
Divi is overall a great tool to use - I think I would need to spend a little more time to dig into the tool to provide more long term feedback.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Divi is a far better-looking and easier-to-learn system than Elements. While Elements has flexible columns and more compatibility with third-party systems (Crockoblock), it has a far steeper learning curve. Divi had a better pricing model and was easier to use to work at speed. We also felt it was far more client-friendly for self-editing.
Read full review
We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's hard to quantify, but it's allowed me to create the face of my website, which currently receives tens of thousands of visits each month. This is largely thanks to Divi.
  • It has allowed me to quickly design my own sales and product pages, without having to rely on third-party platforms.
  • Divi's lock-in has made it difficult for me to explore other visual builders that might also be interesting for my website.
  • Es difícil de cuantificar, pero me ha permitido crear la cara visible de mi web, que en este momento recibe decenas de miles de visitas cada mes. En gran parte es gracias a Divi.
  • Me ha permitido diseñar en poco tiempo mis propias páginas de venta y de producto, sin necesidad de depender de espacios de terceros.
  • El lock-in de Divi me ha hecho difícil explorar otros constructores visuales que también podrían ser interesantes para mi web.
Read full review
  • Helped us inject dynamic content into existing site very quickly
  • Wasted a lot of time to implement when something complex, such as querying content, was needed
Read full review
ScreenShots