Digital River vs. Spryker Cloud Commerce OS

It is well suited for large organizations with many SKUs, promotions, and large teams, where flexibility and speed to market are not necessarily as important as repeatability and stability. It is also well suited for digital products, especially if they sell internationally. They have the ability to integrate with an existing system for user management and website in a rather straightforward way as well.

Incentivized

Spryker is very well suited (B2C and/or B2B) for big companies with complex and individual business models or also if your company needs a certain level of customization. Very good fit, if you need a scalable system. It is rather not the perfect fit for small companies or companies with very basic E-Commerce needs.

• Regional settings like local payment methods, ability to apply or not apply local VAT etc.
• Reporting and any kind of business analysis.
• Easy usage of the platform.
• Marketing is definitely strong side of Digital River Global Commerce. Apart from the features it has, there is a strong team behind it who can make all your fantasies come true using all their expertise and possibility of the platform.

Incentivized

• Extendable - you can extend the core functionalities to every business need.
• Scalable - the technical implementation supports a highly scalable system approach.
• Adjustable - besides implementing new functionalities the core functionalities can be adjusted to the business needs.
• Up-to-date - compared to other E-Business solutions, the technological foundation of Spryker is growing, with the technological development and implementations [which] are kept up-to-date with quarterly releases.

Incentivized

• Integrating with any 3rd party is challenging. The more you can do to clearly define your requirements, the easier it will be to integrate.
• It can be difficult to differentiate and customize your product with an outsourced solution.
• Your internal timeline might not match with their timeline and delivery schedule.

• The documentation and developer bootcamp is sometimes out-of-date.
• Open code, not open source, all bugs need to be submitted to an internal system without accepting patches from communities.
• Steep learning curve.
• The bridges at the core level sometimes cause difficulties in project-level implementation.

Inertia and cost. To switch platforms would require a significant undertaking to migrate product catalogs, websites and retool marketing efforts. It would require a significant cost differential or game changing technology that would bring a decent ROI on the change

Spryker's usability depends a lot on custom development. Therefore, I would like not to consider usability as something that comes with Spryker Cloud Commerce OS. Spryker Cloud Commerce OS; however, brings all the tools needed to design a solution with great usability.

Support suffered from Spryker Cloud Commerce OS's rapid growth. Contacts, department heads, and support systems changed frequently. Support processes as well as documentation are rather poor. One notices that they are putting more effort into the customers recently, but in the course of growth, there is still a lack of focus here. As a customer, I would like to see growth at a slower pace and a phase of stabilization.

Incentivized

This was in place when I migrated to the role. We were greatly satisfied with the server and products that we did not pursue other products.

If you compare Spryker with commerce solutions on the market, you will notice that the focus is not on the front end. Spryker assumes that the store is only one of many possible channels through which customers order today and in the future. To understand the differences, one must therefore take a look at Spryker's architecture. This is divided into the Spryker [Cloud] Commerce OS (the backend with all process-related components), the front-end modules for B2C and B2B, as well as the integration modules (middleware) and interfaces (Glue API).

• More sales and broader reach to consumers. With the web presence of the eCommerce site, Korn/Ferry products were accessible 24 hours/ 7 days a week. Prior to that change, consumers had to call to order products and had to wait on office hours of when a Customer Service Rep was available.
• Access to data and analytical information for sales. This also allowed for making a more efficient inventory process.
• Transformed the Customer Service role to Commercial Operations which was a major plus. The position became more a support position (which is what was needed) than what was previously a Data Entry position. This also allowed opportunities for marketing a lot of the eProducts to consumers that the organization had.

• Time-To-Market: With Spryker you can run MVPs in less time and you can test new functionality with certain groups of users.
• Due to its speed it is very likely to have reoccurring customer because of a very good customer experience.
• With Spryker our customers increased their revenue especially in times of Corona where orders doubled and Spryker was able to cope with the load with no substantial increase in server power.

Incentivized