DemandScience vs. Paper.li

DemandScience is great if you are looking for the ability to target very specific titles, roles, companies, etc., and receive high quality leads. They have an incredible scale compared to other partners my team has worked with, but their leads also perform very well down the funnel. This is not always the case because oftentimes, a partner will have room to scale well, but the leads are colder. I'm really impressed with how well DemandScience targets and also with how quickly they respond to me when I have any questions. Recently, my DemandScience rep reached out because he wanted to get our targeting more honed in on our ideal customer. He wanted to work with me to see down-funnel data (where possible and allowed) so that we could create a more targeted campaign. Other partners have never put this kind of time into our partnership.

Incentivized

You don't have a bandwidth to come up with new fresh content daily for Twitter but want to keep the account active.

Incentivized

• Client Service/ Account Management
• Flexible in terms of reporting and can provide more than one per week
• Prompt in turning around previews and other client deliverables
• Competitive pricing and good coverage across EMEA markets and Middle East
• Access to senior decision makers in the business

Incentivized

• Adds visibility to your account - set the criteria up and have the ejournal run automatically sending out tweets daily that tag other industry handles and hashtags. By doing so you will keep your account active with minimal time investment.
• Pose as a thought leader by sharing relevant content and industry news and get more Twitter followers
• Get free traffic to your pages by expanding on your company or service in the bio section and linking back

Incentivized

• Management and attention to detail - several items slip through the cracks.
• Coordination between account management and invoicing has been sloppy.
• Better intent data to match profiles.
• Connecting the download to the actual sponsor - often heard, "We never downloaded XYZ."

Incentivized

• Lots of great features are no longer there

Incentivized

It works well for lead generation but renewal will depend on the strategy and budget at the point we need to renew to see if it will align.

Incentivized

The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.

Incentivized

The DemandScience Activate CSM team is always helpful and attentive to our organization's needs and goals. We receive thorough attention and detail from the team through regular touch bases and a standard reporting cadence. The team always asks where they can improve, and works to provide insights that matter to our organization and help us to try new things.

Incentivized

They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.

Incentivized

Demand Science was less expensive when quoting cost per lead than Tech Target. Other than that, the program sounded almost the same. I selected Demand Science because I was price sensitive while trying to test whether the tactic of content syndication was effective for us.

Incentivized

I have tried Scoop.it but it's not really an alternative. I'm not aware of any other products similar to Paper.li

Incentivized

• Delivered quality leads that had engaged with our top of funnel content
• Added quality contacts to our marketing database
• Cost per lead slightly higher than some other vendors
• Quick to set up, launch and deliver the campaign once everything in place
• Excellent account management and named-person support

Incentivized