DemandScience vs. DivvyHQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
DivvyHQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
DivvyHQ is a content marketing platform with a central Dashboard and Calendar for managing publication schedules and coordinating workflow (with workflow controls for security), and publishing content. Pricing starts at $25 per month for each user (the Divvy Lite plan with limited features) and rises to $195 per month for each user (Divvy Enterprise with more advanced features, like Custom Workflow, Publishing, API, Calendar Layers, and a dedicated support specialist). DivvyHQ also offers…N/A
Pricing
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$1,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Features
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
DivvyHQ
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Audience profiling and targeting8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard7.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
DivvyHQ
9.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Approval workflows00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content collaboration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Content calendar00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
DivvyHQ
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Content hub00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content distribution00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content automation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conductor
Conductor
Score 8.6 out of 10
Conductor
Conductor
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience is great if you are looking for the ability to target very specific titles, roles, companies, etc., and receive high quality leads. They have an incredible scale compared to other partners my team has worked with, but their leads also perform very well down the funnel. This is not always the case because oftentimes, a partner will have room to scale well, but the leads are colder. I'm really impressed with how well DemandScience targets and also with how quickly they respond to me when I have any questions. Recently, my DemandScience rep reached out because he wanted to get our targeting more honed in on our ideal customer. He wanted to work with me to see down-funnel data (where possible and allowed) so that we could create a more targeted campaign. Other partners have never put this kind of time into our partnership.
Read full review
DivvyHQ is well suited for our company because they develop a plan of action that is highly tailored and specific to our current and projected needs. They help us understand items that we can be looking out for in the future and things we need to be made aware of.
Read full review
Pros
  • Client Service/ Account Management
  • Flexible in terms of reporting and can provide more than one per week
  • Prompt in turning around previews and other client deliverables
  • Competitive pricing and good coverage across EMEA markets and Middle East
  • Access to senior decision makers in the business
Read full review
  • High quality presentations
  • Low costs
Read full review
Cons
  • Management and attention to detail - several items slip through the cracks.
  • Coordination between account management and invoicing has been sloppy.
  • Better intent data to match profiles.
  • Connecting the download to the actual sponsor - often heard, "We never downloaded XYZ."
Read full review
  • campaigns interface is a bit outdated
  • I'd like to see the dashboard/homepage spruced up
  • open on calendars rather than recent activity
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It works well for lead generation but renewal will depend on the strategy and budget at the point we need to renew to see if it will align.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The DemandScience Activate CSM team is always helpful and attentive to our organization's needs and goals. We receive thorough attention and detail from the team through regular touch bases and a standard reporting cadence. The team always asks where they can improve, and works to provide insights that matter to our organization and help us to try new things.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Demand Science was less expensive when quoting cost per lead than Tech Target. Other than that, the program sounded almost the same. I selected Demand Science because I was price sensitive while trying to test whether the tactic of content syndication was effective for us.
Read full review
The corporate communication team uses DivvyHQ, TweetDeck and Agorapulse. Each one is used for different purposes and helps us meets our objectives. DivvyHQ helps Unum and Colonial Life's corporate communications teams stay in touch with one another's work and aware of what the other is doing. It allows for content collaboration and keeps us on track to meet individual deadlines.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Delivered quality leads that had engaged with our top of funnel content
  • Added quality contacts to our marketing database
  • Cost per lead slightly higher than some other vendors
  • Quick to set up, launch and deliver the campaign once everything in place
  • Excellent account management and named-person support
Read full review
  • content scheduling is almost seamless
  • the corporate communications teams are transparent with one another
  • content calendars keep us organized
Read full review
ScreenShots

DivvyHQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Content Operations DashboardScreenshot of The most robust content calendar on the marketScreenshot of Content Interface (List View)Screenshot of Sandbox (Content item detail view)Screenshot of Sandbox > Content (HTML) Editor