Dell AppSync vs. Fivetran

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dell AppSync
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Dell AppSync is copy data management designed to empower application owners to satisfy copy demand for data repurposing, operational recovery, and disaster recovery. AppSync is designed to simplify, orchestrate, and automate the process of generating and consuming copies of production data.N/A
Fivetran
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Fivetran replicates applications, databases, events and files into a high-performance data warehouse, after a five minute setup. The vendor says their standardized cloud pipelines are fully managed and zero-maintenance. The vendor says Fivetran began with a realization: For modern companies using cloud-based software and storage, traditional ETL tools badly underperformed, and the complicated configurations they required often led to project failures. To streamline and accelerate…
$0.01
per credit
Pricing
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$0.01
per credit
Standard
$0.01
per credit
Enterprise
$0.01
per credit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Features
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Dell AppSync
-
Ratings
Fivetran
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Dell AppSync
-
Ratings
Fivetran
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Dell AppSync
-
Ratings
Fivetran
6.2
Ratings
25% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Dell AppSync
-
Ratings
Fivetran
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Small Businesses
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 7.2 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Dell AppSyncFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
Dell AppSync maintains consistent and automated backups and in case of disaster recovery the software provides all the options of automatically generated daily copies to choose from. Integration can take place in different environments such as VMware, SQL, Oracle, Microsoft and others. Built-in management and compatibility makes work easier and lets you keep the always-on service up and running. We recommend Dell AppSync.
Read full review
[Fivetran is] very well suited when you are using popular and common data sources, such as the major ad platforms, and SaaS platforms such as Salesforce. If the majority of your data sources are custom internal applications or databases, may be less value as you aren't leveraging the delivered connectors.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy Configuration
  • Ease of Use
  • Set and Forget
Read full review
  • Simplified ETL from a wide range of data sources
  • Stable and painless data pipeline
  • Granular control over what parts of the data source are loaded
Read full review
Cons
  • We had no failures in performing backups and testing with disaster recovery.
  • Documentation not available in Portuguese.
Read full review
  • Doesn't include support for a Kinesis stream as a data source so couldn't be used for some use cases under consideration
  • Doesn't support the use of "BEFORE DELETE" triggers
  • No support for serverless Aurora
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very easy and intuitive to setup and maintain as there usually are not that many options. Very well documented (e.g. how to setup each connector, how the schema looks like, any specific features of this connector etc.). Also the operation is intuitive, e.g. you have status pages, log pages, configuration pages etc. for each connector.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It runs pretty well and gets our data from point A to point cluster quickly enough. Honestly, it's not something I think about unless it breaks and that's pretty rare.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dell EMC Storage products are in use accross the estate so is more suited to use Dell software to manage the replicaiton of data between storage arrays. Provides us with a stable and trouble free mehtod to replicate data across luns. Good product to have implemented during an datacenter outage
Read full review
Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes. We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization. These were 2 places where Fivetran out-performed, other vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It brought more security of network data.
  • Automation and agility in business processes.
Read full review
  • Saved a lot of manual development days (unable to quantify)
  • Accelerated the time to add a new source to the data warehouse a lot
Read full review
ScreenShots