Delinea Secret Server vs. Oracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Delinea Secret Server
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Secret Server (originally from Thycotic, now from Delinea since the 2021 Thycotic merger with Centrify) is an enterprise password management application, which is available with either a cloud-based or on-premise deployment which emphasizes fast deployment, scalability, and simplicity.N/A
Oracle ESSO
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Enterprise Single Sign-On is a single sign-on (SSO) solution, originally named Passlogix and owned and supported by Oracle since 2010.N/A
Pricing
Delinea Secret ServerOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Delinea Secret ServerOracle ESSO
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Delinea Secret ServerOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus
Best Alternatives
Delinea Secret ServerOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.1 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.1 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Delinea Secret ServerOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
3.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Delinea Secret ServerOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
Great for managing access to secrets and servers and is more secure than storing passwords in a browser. The browser plugin to autofill passwords works well. Being able to schedule access ahead of time is a big plus for me as I can be forgetful. If you want a lightweight password vault, however, it may not be the best choice.
Read full review
Good if you want a temporary solution to too many passwords.
Read full review
Pros
  • Works well with RBAC, workflow for access requests, and approvals for third parties.
  • Allows monitoring and recording of remote sessions.
  • Available for on-premise and cloud.
Read full review
  • Flexible to work with most web sites and thick clients
  • Avoids users having to type their passwords repeatedly
  • Fairly performant
Read full review
Cons
  • The sharing functionality NEEDS improvement. We share most passwords at a group level, but then it becomes impossible to share them with a dynamic group and one or two one-off people as well. This is a major shortcoming.
  • I don't love the interface. I feel like there is an attempt at a dashboard, but it is really not effective.
  • I've heard, but never seen, that the software can actually change passwords in the target systems. If this is part of its deliverable, I do not know how to use it, and I don't know how you would do that. Seems like a great feature for password management.
Read full review
  • This tool is essentially a hack, making the user experience pretty weak. For example, we use it in an application which has a box to type your password. Every time you enter some data, ESSO steals the focus and types your password into the box, even if you aren't about to submit the form requiring the password.
  • This tool creates a 2nd CN in the directory and this broke some of our applications which were only expecting a single CN per user in the directory. Why can't it use a traditional database instead?
  • This tool caused performance issues with Putty. It would peg our CPUs at 100% if the user had Putty running. It took a very long time to resolve the issue.
Read full review
Usability
My rating is purely based on the configurational activities, as feature-wise delineation has all the features that are very beneficial for customers, though the implementation is a bit more manual work, which can be reduced with a low-code platform. Along with that, we can have a better UI to have intuitiveness and can manage the platform for shared customers in a better way. Overall, it is a very good tool for PAM.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I actually haven't had to work with support. I have spoken to a colleague of mine who has worked with support and has been pleased.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We explored Jum Cloud and ManageEngine. Delinea is comparable in terms of features; however, the implementation of these tools differs. Delinea is a bit more manual than the other two. However, the licensing and overall ROI are better for Delinea, as it provides almost all market-ready solutions and has a robust licensing mechanism, resulting in a better ROI.
Read full review
There's no substitute for properly developed applications that delegate authentication to an external system like Active Directory or a cloud identity provider. That way, the issues with screen scraping and constantly-breaking integration are solved permanently.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The best return on investment is that all of our passwords are now up to date and usable by everyone in the department. The old way could only be accessed by one person at a time, and it was frequently wrong.
  • We save a lot of time in IT by having the passwords easily accessible. We also meet our security audit objectives by using this app instead of, say, an Excel spreadsheet or an old application that is no longer supported, as was the case at a previous workplace.
  • With the size of our department, we don't have enough passwords to go beyond the free version. It's fully functional, but it costs nothing (except some resources on a VM). ROI on free can't be beat.
Read full review
  • We spent a lot of time implementing it on different applications. However, because it uses screen scraping, every time our apps upgraded, it broke the integration with ESSO, so we had to keep fixing the integration. After a few years, we have stopped integrating new apps with it due to this headache.
Read full review
ScreenShots