DDoS-GUARD vs. NETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DDoS-GUARD
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
A comprehensive DDoS protection service for websites and servers CDN and traffic optimization features. The company's own geo-distributed DDoS mitigation network with nodes in the United States, Hong Kong, Russia, Kazakhstan, and the Netherlands makes it possible to process large amounts of traffic and protect customer sites and servers. DDoS Protection for ISP and DC Network BGP L3-7 protection. White label. API. Self-developed solutions. 24/7/365 support.…N/A
NETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
NETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection security software offers protection across multiple layers of the OSI model. It provides security measures for Layer 2 (Data Link layer) through Layer 7 (Application layer), ensuring complete protection for network infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
DDoS-GUARDNETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DDoS-GUARDNETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$15 per domainNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices for Protected Hosting, Protected VDS, Protected Dedicated Servers are also available on website. Prices for carrier-grade services (IP Transit and Network Protection) are set up individually (please contact our Sales team).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DDoS-GUARDNETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Best Alternatives
DDoS-GUARDNETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Akamai App & API Protector
Akamai App & API Protector
Score 8.0 out of 10
Akamai App & API Protector
Akamai App & API Protector
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Testimonials
DDoS-GUARDNETSCOUT Arbor DDoS Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for handling predictable surges (100,000 daily requests), defending against volumetric attacks and Quick Setup for new client onboarding with amazing DNS Integration. It is probably less effective or I would say there is scope for improvement against sophisticated multi-vector attacks and direct-to-origin threats bypassing its cloud protection when IPs are exposed.
Read full review
Good fit
  • If you receive layer 7 attacks on a regular basis targeting critical infrastructure that needs to stay up, this is a good fit in conjuction with out-of-band TMS or in-band APS. This is obviously going to be contingent on your budget.
Not a good fit
  • If you are looking to mitigate large volume attacks that are saturating your uplinks to the Internet and taking your entire network down, this (or any on-premesis solution, for that matter) is not the solution for you. Look into any external DDoS scrubbing service to let them take the blow and return only the clean traffic to you.
  • The Peakflow system has many features similar to an IPS with the ability to block traffic based on layer 7 signatures, but country code, etc and may be tempting to use this as an IDS/IPS solution. This will cause issues for a few reasons, cheif among them is that the system is not intended for permananent or indefinite mitigations. Additionally, signitures are only updated on software version upgrades.
Read full review
Pros
  • Real-Time Traffic Filtering
  • Integration
  • Responsive Support
Read full review
  • Arbor's layer 7 countermeasures are very good out of the box, but it is very easy to reconfigure values and see the impact in real-time.
  • Peakflow SP provides fairly detailed traffic analysis and breakdown for top-N data such as top talkers, top ASNs, top ports and so on. They offer "SP Insight" as a product to build in more powerful reporting on the already-collected metrics with an interface very similar to Kibana or one of its many forks. We are not licensed for that so I can't speak to its capabilities.
  • Arbor allows for a good amount of automation. Fast flood detection ensures that if pre-determined thresholds are quickly exceeded, preconfigured mitigations can be started or in the event of an extremely large volumetric attack you can trigger an Arbor Cloud (sold separately) mitigation or a remotely-triggered blackhole announcement to drop traffic to the attacked destination IP address(es) upstream.
  • ATAC (Arbor support) is very helpful. The level of support our organization maintains covers ATAC performing all update functions to all Arbor appliances - SP and TMS.
Read full review
Cons
  • Detailed post-attack analytics
  • Slow Response During Edge Cases
  • More intuitive API dashboard
Read full review
  • Arbor is a highly expensive company. this was the major reason behind not going for the Arbor sightline in the first place. Although its features are good but the cost is unjustifiable.
  • The implementation and the understanding of this tool are full of complexity and perplexity.
  • I am looking forward to having a new update on it. They used to update their versions quite frequently but it's been a long time they haven’t updated or maybe it is not in their priority lists right now.
Read full review
Usability
The setup is straightforward. DNS rerouting and a clear client area wizard protect our 30+ client sites fast considering our small team. The real-time dashboard simplifies monitoring 100,000 daily requests, and 24/7 support resolves issues like rate-limit tweaks. It could be a 10/10 if API dashboard is more intuitive and if reporting could be more granular
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We chose DDoS-GUARD for its cost-effective and flexible plans. This software had the ability to meet our requirements. That is to scale with our 30+ client websites and 100,000 daily requests. The Integration also seemed better than AWS ecosystems and simpler API management. This aligned better with our multi-platform needs and budget.
Read full review
We chose Cisco because we had past experience with some Cisco products and we were ready to invest a high cost for Cisco Secure but unfortunately it didn’t come up to our expectations and left us in despair. The speed, the price and the analytics of Cisco, everything was just average but when we moved to Arbor we came to realize that market still have some good network analytics tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has ensured 99.9% uptime for 30+ client websites of ours during attacks. DDoS-GUARD has cut churn by 15%, retaining significant money in annual contracts. Our clients cite reliability as a key reason for renewals.
  • Outsourcing DDoS mitigation to DDoS-GUARD saves us $50,000 yearly versus building an in-house solution. This helps and frees our team to focus on high-value app development and boosts our billable hours.
  • With quick setup, we have been able to win 5 new contracts worth $75,000 annually and strengthened our position as a Cybersecurity Managed Services IT provider.
Read full review
  • Arbor is good in empower us to monitor the issues in the network.
  • We can get better traffic analytics and reports are quite detailed.
  • The price is quite high which makes it a little hard choice for us.
Read full review
ScreenShots

DDoS-GUARD Screenshots

Screenshot of