TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    DBeaver

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/ADBeaver offers comprehensive data management tools designed to help teams explore, process, and administrate SQL, NoSQL, and cloud data sources. DBeaver is available commercially as DBeaver PRO and for free as DBeaver Community.

    $11

    per month per user

    Liquibase

    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Liquibase is a database change management tool that extends DevOps best practices to the database, helping teams release software faster and safer by bringing the database change process into existing CI/CD automation. According to the 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps Report, elite performers are 3.4 times more likely to incorporate database change management into their process than low performers. Liquibase value proposition: Liquibase speeds up the development…N/A
    Pricing
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Editions & Modules
    Lite Edition Subscription
    $11
    per month per user
    Enterprise Edition Subscription
    $25
    per month per user
    Lite Edition License
    $110
    per year per user
    Enterprise Edition License
    $250
    per year per user
    Ultimate Edition License
    $500
    per year per user
    CloudBeaver Enterprise
    $1,000
    per year per 5 users
    DBeaver Team Edition
    $1,280
    per year per 1 administrator and 2 developers
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for multi-user licenses.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Database Development
    Comparison of Database Development features of DBeaver and Liquibase
    Feature
    DBeaver
    7.9
    9 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Liquibase
    -
    Ratings
    Version control tools8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test data generation7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance optimization tools7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Schema maintenance8.49 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database change management9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database Administration
    Comparison of Database Administration features of DBeaver and Liquibase
    Feature
    DBeaver
    8.4
    8 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Liquibase
    -
    Ratings
    User management7.95 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database security8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database status reporting8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change management9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Small Businesses
    Sequel Pro
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle Autonomous Database
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Toad Database Developer Tools
    Score8 out of 10
    Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (9 ratings)
    8.0
    (59 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.4
    (57 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    DBeaverLiquibase
    Likelihood to Recommend
    DBeaver
    If you are connecting to Snowflake and want to query from your laptop, I find that this is much easier to use than Snowflake's IDE. It allows us as a business intelligence team to more easily connect to our servers, and code with much less hassle. It would be less appropriate if you are only on an on-premises SQL server, in that case, I would just use SSMS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    Based on my experience so far on using Liquibase in my current project, I have seen that Liquibase changelogs are version control where multiple team members and developers can work together on database and deployed automatically via CI/CD Pipeline integration using github actions and it applies same changelogs to all enviroments to remain in sync and avoid any enviroment drift. Also as Liquibase stores changelog audits in DATABASECHANGELOG table it helps in tracking purposes and to easily rollback any change . Whereas in some scenarios I feel that Liquibase have some drawbacks where if complex transformation between tables is not optimized for bulk data operations which eventually degrades database performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    DBeaver
    • Data import/export and SQL Script generation are quick and simple to do.
    • Fairly intuitive when viewing/editing table data.
    • Ability to save SQL scripts per server and recall them easily.
    • Handy intelligence when writing queries, functions, and stored procs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    • Liquibase tracks changes in a metadata table contained directly in the target database, making easy administration for the DBA.
    • Liquibase handles many validation tests out of the box, making it easy to choose which ones you want to include, with options for writing your own if you choose. This makes it robust and flexible in terms of validation before deployment.
    • Liquibase provides easy integration into deployment pipelines for CI/CD. We use it with GitHub for source control and Circle CI for validation and deployment pipelines.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    DBeaver
    • Some icons are kinda small and difficult to understand what they do
    • The spanish translation could be better
    • I think there are many functions that could be useful for me but I don't know what they do
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    • I would like Liquibase to explore all errors in the changelog files compared to one at a time. We spent a lot of time troubleshooting one error at a time versus having a batch log of errors in each file.
    • Understanding where to get support on things. I spent a lot of time researching externally to learn what the best practices were. Although I found some of the youtube videos helpful, I would like a little more of a technical support. This may be a feature with the paid tier, however, we leveraged open source.
    • Seeing more examples of how others use Liquibase and their usecases will be helpful. That way we can learn from each other which may help us improve on our own deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    DBeaver
    No answers on this topic
    Liquibase
    We are and will continue using Liquibase and it has become an integral part of our portfolio offering, any new product is by default adopting Liquibase stack.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    DBeaver
    No answers on this topic
    Liquibase
    Build process is too time consuming and getting extra DB instance takes a toll
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    DBeaver
    Not a lot of users have DBeaver so fewer resources are available online to help you if you have any issues. When I was trying to figure out how to create my own ER diagrams, it was a little tough to find resources
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    Liquibase has been responsive and even is letting our group test some new products they are developing and even made code changes to their production system because of a couple bugs we have reported. Liquibase licensing has also been easy and simple. I have nothing bad to say about any of the Liquibase staff I have talked to. They also hold free information webinars for new content that helps spread adoption and moving the product forward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    DBeaver
    No answers on this topic
    Liquibase
    the database deployments helped us with increased productivity,
    faster delivery and low risk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    DBeaver
    MySQL workbench from MySQL only supports MySQL databases and it only provides basic functionality. On top of that, the user experience could be quite confusing for first-time users. SSMS from SQL server doesn't support inline editing nicely. The view for inline editing and view data is different, making it uncomfortable to use. All in all, DBeaver is the best tool when you manage a lot of databases with different types.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    There is no real competitor when it comes to what Liquibase does - at least not at the time we considered it three years ago. It was an easy choice in this regard, but we could have said no to it if it made our workload more difficult. But our proof of concept showed there were easy wins to be had by implementing its software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    DBeaver
    • Positive Ability to manage DBeaver and query ad-hoc quickly
    • By having the queries saved it has saved developer time and thereby increased the ROI on the investment on the tool
    • This has made firefighting quicker and freed up resources for more development work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liquibase
    • We need to re-educate developers to use Liquibase.
    • In some cases, it is hard to align when several teams work on the same DB.
    • On the other hand, Liquibase provides order and consistency in managing DB changes.
    • Evidence and traceability are a plus.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots