TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Astra DB

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AAstra DB from DataStax is a vector database for developers that need to get accurate Generative AI applications into production, fast.N/A

    Qubole

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AQubole is a NoSQL database offering from the California-based company of the same name.N/A
    Pricing
    Astra DBQubole
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Astra DBQubole
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Astra DBQubole
    Considered Both Products
    DataStax
    No answer on this topic
    Qubole
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    39 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    39 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    34 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    38 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Astra DBQubole
    Vector Database
    Comparison of Vector Database features of Astra DB and Qubole
    Feature
    Astra DB
    6.8
    6 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Qubole
    -
    Ratings
    Vector Data Connection8.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vector Data Editing6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attribute Management9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Geospatial Analysis6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Geometric Transformations6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vector Data Visualization6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Coordinate Reference System Management:5.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Import/Export6.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Symbolization and Styling6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Sharing and Collaboration7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Astra DB and Qubole
    Feature
    Astra DB
    -
    Ratings
    Qubole
    8.3
    1 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Performance00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Astra DBQubole
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Astra DBQubole
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (40 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.8
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (38 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Astra DBQubole
    Likelihood to Recommend
    DataStax
    We've been super happy with Astra DB. It's been extremely well-suited for our vector search needs as described in previous responses. With Astra DB’s high-performance vector search, Maester’s AI dynamically optimizes responses in real-time, adapting to new user interactions without requiring costly retraining cycles.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    I find Qubole is well suited for getting started analyzing data in the cloud without being locked in to a specific cloud vendor's tooling other than the underlying filesystem. Since the data itself is not isolated to any Qubole cluster, it can be easily be collected back into a cloud-vendor's specific tools for further analysis, therefore I find it complementary to any offerings such as Amazon EMR or Google DataProc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    DataStax
    • We need to be able to process a lot of data (our biggest clients process hundreds of milions of transactions every month). However, it is not only the amount of data, it is also an unpredictable patterns with spikes occuring at different points of time - something athat Astra is great at.
    • Our processing needs to be extremaly fast. Some of our clients use our enrichment in a synchronous way, meaning that any delay in processing is holding up the whole transaction lifecycle and can have a major impact on the client. Astra is very fast.
    • A close collaboration with GCP makes our life very easy. All of our technology sits in Google Cloud, so having Astra in there makes it a no-brainer solution for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    • From a UI perspective, I find Qubole's closest comparison to Cloudera's HUE; it provides a one-stop shop for all data browsing and querying needs.
    • Auto scaling groups and auto-terminating clusters provides cost savings for idle resources.
    • Qubole fits itself well into the open-source data science market by providing a choice of tools that aren't tied to a specific cloud vendor.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    DataStax
    • Need better fine-grained Security options.
    • The support team sometimes requires the escalate button pressed on tickets, to get timely responses. I will say, once the ticket is escalated, action is taken.
    • They require better documentation on the migration of data. The three primary methods for migrating large data volumes are bulk, Cassandra Data Migrator, and ZDM (Zero Downtime Migration Utility). Over time I have become very familiar will all three of these methods; however, through working with the Services team and the support team, it seemed like we were breaking new ground. I feel if the utilities were better documented and included some examples and/or use cases from large data migrations; this process would have been easier. One lesson learned is you likely need to migrate your application servers to the same cloud provider you host Astra on; otherwise, the latency is too large for latency-sensitive applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    • Providing an open selection of all cloud provider instance types with no explanation as to their ideal use cases causes too much confusion for new users setting up a new cluster. For example, not everyone knows that Amazon's R or X-series models are memory optimized, while the C and M-series are for general computation.
    • I would like to see more ETL tools provided other than DistCP that allow one to move data between Hadoop Filesystems.
    • From the cluster administration side, onboarding of new users for large companies seems troublesome, especially when trying to create individual cluster per team within the company. Having the ability to debug and share code/queries between users of other teams / clusters should also be possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    DataStax
    No answers on this topic
    Qubole
    Personally, I have no issues using Amazon EMR with Hue and Zeppelin, for example, for data science and exploratory analysis. The benefits to using Qubole are that it offers additional tooling that may not be available in other cloud providers without manual installation and also offers auto-terminating instances and scaling groups.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    DataStax
    It's a great product but suffers with counters. This isn't a deal breaker but lets down what is otherwise a good all round solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    DataStax
    Their response time is fast, in case you do not contact them during business hours, they give a very good follow-up to your case. They also facilitate video calls if necessary for debugging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    DataStax
    Graph, search, analytics, administration, developer tooling, and monitoring are all incorporated into a single platform by Astra DB. Mongo Db is a self-managed infrastructure. Astra DB has Wide column store and Mongo DB has Document store. The best thing is that Astra DB operates on Java while Mongo DB operates on C++
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    Qubole was decided on by upper management rather than these competitive offerings. I find that Databricks has a better Spark offering compared to Qubole's Zeppelin notebooks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    DataStax
    We are well aware of the Cassandra architecture and familiar with the open source tooling that Datastax provides the industry (K8sSandra / Stargate) to scale Cassandra on Kubernetes.
    Having prior knowledge of Cassandra / Kubernetes means we know that under the hood Astra is built on infinitely scalable technologies. We trust that the foundations that Astra is built on will scale so we know Astra will scale.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    DataStax
    • Better uptime due to the managed service having no outages
    • Less technical debt because we don't need to worry about upgrading our Cassandra clusters
    • Lower cost on infrastructure as a whole
    • Quick and easy to integrate vector search into our tech stack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qubole
    • We like to say that Qubole has allowed for "data democratization", meaning that each team is responsible for their own set of tooling and use cases rather than being limited by versions established by products such as Hortonworks HDP or Cloudera CDH
    • One negative impact is that users have over-provisioned clusters without realizing it, and end up paying for it. When setting up a new cluster, there are too many choices to pick from, and data scientists may not understand the instance types or hardware specs for the datasets they need to operate on.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots