TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Datadog vs. Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Datadog

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ADatadog is a monitoring service for IT, Dev and Ops teams who write and run applications at scale, and want to turn the massive amounts of data produced by their apps, tools and services into actionable insight.

    $18

    per month per host

    Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) is a monitoring and application performance management option, with the core datacenter and cloud-based systems monitoring.N/A
    Pricing
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Editions & Modules
    Log Management
    $1.27
    per month (billed annually) per host
    Infrastructure
    $15.00
    per month (billed annually) per host
    Standard
    $18
    per month per host
    Enterprise
    $27
    per month per host
    DevSecOps Pro
    $27
    per month per host
    APM
    $31.00
    per month (billed annually) per host
    DevSecOps Enterprise
    $41
    per month per host
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing. Multi-Year/Volume discounts available (500+ hosts/mo).—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Considered Both Products
    Datadog
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    HP SiteScope is truly an agentless solution, with all the limitations of such approach, SCOM also has limited functionality for agentless monitoring, but you always can switch to agent-based configuration in SCOM, but not in SiteScope. Datadog is a good cloud-based monitoring …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    It has more intuitive features and business ready monitoring capabilities
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    21 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    14 Answers
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    Features
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Application Performance Management
    Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Datadog and Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Feature
    Datadog
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    6.1
    22 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Application monitoring00 Ratings5.020 Ratings
    Database monitoring00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
    Threshold alerts00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Predictive capabilities00 Ratings2.020 Ratings
    Application performance management console00 Ratings3.019 Ratings
    Collaboration tools00 Ratings6.017 Ratings
    Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications00 Ratings4.020 Ratings
    Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings4.018 Ratings
    Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
    Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Small Businesses
    Amazon CloudWatch
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sumo Logic
    Score9.5 out of 10
    SolarWinds AppOptics
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    NetBrain Technologies
    Score9.2 out of 10
    SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor
    Score6.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (22 ratings)
    8.0
    (25 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    7.3
    (8 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    DatadogMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Datadog
    Datadog works really well with complex microservices architecture like any E-commerce platform which will be having multiple services but they all are interdependent to others so in this scenario Datadog will be best to monitor these as it will show the transactions also between those microservices. If you are using multiple services in your architecture whether it will be cloud services or on prem services Datadog will be the best choice to monitor all those service with in Datadog so that you can see everything in a single place. But if you are having small architecture and few services in that then in that scenario you can use Datadog but it will be little costly as compared to other but obviously the features are very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    More appropriate for:
    • Pure Microsoft ecosystem environments (Windows Server and SQL server) and the most common Linux and UNIX platforms.
    • Environments where cost is less of a factor than settling on a single platform for monitoring
    • Environments where the administrators are familiar with the setup and installation of SCOM.
    Less appropriate for:
    • Pure UNIX/Linux shops, especially versions not supported out of the box by SCOM.
    • Shops that cannot afford the engagement to setup/configure and maintain on a continuous basis.
    • Shops that cannot dedicate personnel to the care and feeding of SCOM, especially when supporting larger environments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Datadog
    • Create Dashboards as per application, environments, and Custom metrics in one panel.
    • Log aggregation, one-stop Application monitoring tools for the whole infrastructure.
    • Playbooks, SLA definition, success and error quotas, request visualizations.
    • DB monitoring, Serverless stack monitoring.
    • Alerting of Production incidents so we can quickly resolve the issues on time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Allows us to visualize our systems in a single interface and see the status of health as well as relevant performance metrics.
    • A flexible and powerful interface with active alerting covering domain controllers, SQL servers, etc...
    • Allows you to customize your views and workspaces for specific tasks and needs.
    • Reporting is powerful and flexible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Datadog
    • Alert windows cause lag in notifications (e.g. if the alert window is X errors in 1 hour, we won't get alerted until the end of the 1 hour range)
    • I would appreciate more supportive examples for how to filter and view metrics in the explorer
    • I would like a more clear interface for metrics that are missing in a time frame, rather than only showing tags/etc. for metrics that were collected within the currently viewed time frame
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One of the biggest drawbacks to SCOM is the sheer scope and complexity of the system. This can be a pro and a con. The system is very customizable, what you put into it is what you'll get out of it. That said, the learning curve is fairly steep. An organization needs to be committed to putting time and resources into SCOM to get the most out of it. I've heard stories from colleagues of several different companies that invested in SCOM and then abandoned it due to the excessive time and care required.
    • SCOM is expensive. Not only is the enterprise licensing costly, SCOM requires it's own servers, operational and warehouse databases to be maintained.
    • The OOB SCOM reports are a bit clunky and feel outdated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Datadog
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Datadog
    There is some room for improvement, but the Datadog team sends out updates frequently, and the UI is user-friendly for engineers, with no significant loading issues or region-specific problems. That was one of the key reasons we preferred Datadog; our company has employees worldwide, and it wasn't difficult to transition to the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Ease of Use and user friendly dashboard
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Datadog
    The support team usually gets it right. We did have a rather complicate issue setting up monitoring on a domain controller. However, they are usually responsive and helpful over chat. The downside would be I don’t think they have any phone support. If that is important to you this might not be a good fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Hard to get support. The product is not being actively developed anymore, so it is hard to get new features for the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Datadog
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Datadog
    We are still trying other products, but people still like Datadog. After setting up a dashboard, it's great for monitoring instances on Datadog. Also, the DevOps team had a good time setting up Datadog. It means Datadog was way easier to set up compared to those others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We used Altiris and WSUS and in the beginning Altiris had the better admin interface than SCOM, but it is no longer the case as SCOM has refined their admin interface. Altiris still has better and more robust group assignments for management roles and those two other tools can better manage non Windows OS devices than SCOM but for a large enterprise Windows shop, if you can afford it, SCOM is the way to go.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Datadog
    • Saved us (time & money) from developing our own monitoring utilities that would pale in comparison
    • Alerts allow us to remedy issues before our customers even know about them
    • Tracking resource usage over time allows us to better plan for future needs, before it becomes a pain-point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It has allowed us to provide an Enterprise Event/Alert management solution to the Global company
    • It has taken a long time to get it to provide valuable alerts and information, lots of user resources and investment.
    • It assists with 24/7 monitoring and out of hours support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Datadog Screenshots

    Screenshot of the out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards.Screenshot of Datadog's collaboration features, where users can discuss issues in-context with production data, annotate changes and notify their teams, see who responded to that alert before, and discover what was done to fix it.Screenshot of where Datadog unifies traces, metrics, and logs—the three pillars of observability.Screenshot of some of Datadog's 400+ built-in integrations.Screenshot of Datadog's Service Map, which decomposes an application into all its component services and draws the observed dependencies between these services in real timeScreenshot of centralized log data, pulled from any source.