D2iQ Mesosphere vs. Lens Kubernetes IDE

D2iQ Mesosphere

8 Reviews and Ratings

Lens Kubernetes IDE

3 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
D2iQ Mesosphere	Score7.5 out of 10	N/A	D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere) still supports the Mesosphere solution, which is designed for operations at a very large scale. It's powered by DC/OS, a production-proven cloud native platform that runs containers and data services on the same infrastructure. D2iQ rebranded to reflect their change and broadening of focus towards Kubernetes but other services such as Cassandra, Kafka, and Spark. D2iQ also now offers IT professional services in tandem with its products.	N/A
Lens Kubernetes IDE	Score8 out of 10	N/A	Lens is an open source Kubernetes IDE developed and supported by Mirantis.	N/A

Pricing

D2iQ Mesosphere

Lens Kubernetes IDE

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
D2iQ Mesosphere	Lens Kubernetes IDE
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Best Alternatives
	D2iQ Mesosphere	Lens Kubernetes IDE
Small Businesses	Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score9.4 out of 10	Visual Studio Score9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.5 out of 10	PyCharm Score9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score7.4 out of 10	WebStorm Score9.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	D2iQ Mesosphere	Lens Kubernetes IDE
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	D2iQ Mesosphere	Lens Kubernetes IDE
Likelihood to Recommend	D2iQ Mesosphere is well suited for orchestrating workloads. It supports Docker as a container as well as support others. It is highly suitable for running resilient and auto recovering big data/application containers. Mesosphere has proven time and again to be production ready at a massive scale. It supports native single button/API call scale up and scale down and supports various deployment patterns like Blue-Green and others. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mirantis No answers on this topic
Pros	D2iQ Deploying mesosphere and friends (e.g. marathon) Deploying applications (e.g. Cassandra, Jenkins, Spark) on to mesosphere Providing value add components such as velocity, and marathon-lb Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mirantis No answers on this topic
Cons	D2iQ Setting up is a bit of a hassle, especially ZooKeeper state management and mesos and marathon quorum. Occasionally, I observed some failures when deploying something onto Marathon. Logging or detailed error reporting can help. Stale containers and inconsistent states resultant of the cluster failure are hard to solve and need a complete system restart to get it back to normal state. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mirantis No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	D2iQ I happen to like mesosphere because it integrates well with a Jenkins based workflow, Deis is a little more Heroku like and it's not clear how to fit that model into a continuous-integration process. Kubernetes has also been criticized for being complicated. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mirantis No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	D2iQ I see mesosphere as having a positive impact overall on the industry trending Docker and containers in general. Seeing how mesosphere helps and simplifies things for the developer and ops, it is definitely a game changer. Native support of on demand scaling up and down as per the need is one of the best features. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mirantis No answers on this topic
ScreenShots