D2iQ Mesosphere vs. IBM Cloud Managed Istio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
D2iQ Mesosphere
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere) still supports the Mesosphere solution, which is designed for operations at a very large scale. It's powered by DC/OS, a production-proven cloud native platform that runs containers and data services on the same infrastructure. D2iQ rebranded to reflect their change and broadening of focus towards Kubernetes but other services such as Cassandra, Kafka, and Spark. D2iQ also now offers IT professional services in tandem with its products.N/A
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service provides the Managed Istio installation add on, designed to provide additonal control over clusters and the microservices they comprise via automatic updates and lifecycle management of control plane components, and integration with platform logging and monitoring tools.N/A
Pricing
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Features
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
D2iQ Mesosphere
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
D2iQ MesosphereIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
I think right now Mesosphere is newer to Windows environments and has some challenges with stepping in to big data scenarios where YARN is currently being used.
Read full review
It is a perfect application when you have multiple users and/or developers and you want to create rules and standards for access and the ability to change access levels. The reporting of usage is good, but adding more granularity into the metrics that have been used to measure are not specific enough. They provide detail but drilling into the detail would be more appropriate i.e. access to the baseline data.
Read full review
Pros
  • Deploying mesosphere and friends (e.g. marathon)
  • Deploying applications (e.g. Cassandra, Jenkins, Spark) on to mesosphere
  • Providing value add components such as velocity, and marathon-lb
Read full review
  • Debug issues
  • Monitoring
  • allows many services form many different sources
Read full review
Cons
  • Setting up is a bit of a hassle, especially ZooKeeper state management and mesos and marathon quorum.
  • Occasionally, I observed some failures when deploying something onto Marathon. Logging or detailed error reporting can help.
  • Stale containers and inconsistent states resultant of the cluster failure are hard to solve and need a complete system restart to get it back to normal state.
Read full review
  • Still missing functionalities for a full usage as traffic director.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Training and usage support available
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Mesosphere vs. ECS Mesosphere has a direct competition with companies using AWS Cloud, as the ECS product is one of the closest competitors to Mesosphere. Mesosphere has an edge with simplistic hosting and deep and easy integration with Jenkins Pipelines and native plugins support. ECS, on the other hand, does not have much integration with the continuous integration process and is somewhat complex to maintain and manage.
Read full review
1) One-stop solution for all the complex network connectivity managed by [IBM Cloud Managed Istio]. 2) Nice dashboard to understand the flow. 3) Easy to troubleshoot the service if any one of the APIs is not responding. 4) We can integrate it with Azure Kubernetes service and other cloud provider Kubernetes services. 5) Monitoring the health of the pods can be easily configured and alerts can be triggered very accurately with this tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I see mesosphere as having a positive impact overall on the industry trending Docker and containers in general.
  • Seeing how mesosphere helps and simplifies things for the developer and ops, it is definitely a game changer.
  • Native support of on demand scaling up and down as per the need is one of the best features.
Read full review
  • Management burden is reduced resulting in positive ROI.
  • Application is being seamlessly instrumented with good impact on business.
Read full review
ScreenShots