Cyren DNS Security (Cyren Web Security) vs. Netskope NextGen SWG

For any form of company control on a larger scale where threats can have a very detrimental effect but not suited to SME scenarios was cost factor would be a key component and not require as much automation.

Incentivized

Scenarios Well Suited - Replace On Premises Proxies - Control Work from Home users - Data Loss Prevention to data storage in cloud services - Control could be applied to the most used type of operate systems ( Windows, MAC, IOS adn Android) Scenarios Less Appropriate - Shared Devices - Access to the Internal Applications

Incentivized

• Category Control in multiple languages.
• Simple interface controls whever I am.
• Swift and experienced support team.

Incentivized

• Control Web Traffic
• SSL Decrypt
• Control Web 2.0
• Threat Protection
• DLP

Incentivized

• Some enhancements to filetype control as PDF's can be flagged wrongly preventing download as executables
• Quicker log updating on the fly error checking.

Incentivized

• Reporting
• Integration with Azure AD
• Deploy Procedure

Incentivized

Better price point and interface and system thinking ahead to the future and not re-using the same old systems.

Incentivized

The netskope next gen swg win the evaluation process in the follow features: - Better Deploy process - Don't depend of a VPN connection - Native SSL Decryption - WebUI of easy and quickly understanding - Device compliance evaluation - Flexible Scenarios of Deployment - A private network what connect more efficiently to the most used SaaS Services

Incentivized

• Protected against some dangerous day zero threats.

Incentivized

• Complete Control of Web access regardless the location of user
• Deep Application control ( Eg. Allow access just the company tenant of a SaaS App)
• No Restrictions about the device type ( Eg. Windows, MAC and mobiles)

Incentivized