Azure DevOps Server vs. Cycloid Platform Engineering
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure DevOps Server | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | AzureDevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is a test management and application lifecycle management tool, from Microsoft's Visual Studio offerings. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
Cycloid Platform Engineering | N/A | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Cycloid is an engineering platform designed to break down team silos, introduce DevOps best practices and support a hybrid cloud journey for enterprises. It's an internal developer platform that helps to facilitate end-to-end platform engineering adoption at scale in a clear and sustainable manner. Cycloid's Infra Import industrializes manually deployed infrastructure and creates Infra-as-code on the fly to ensure the sustainability and future-proof… | $39 per month per user |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid Platform Engineering | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $2,500 per year per installation | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 3 pricing models are available: - Subscription based - Cloud consumption based - Cloud reselling based (Cycloid is free of charge) Additional monthly platform fee which includes devOps support is applied based on the size and scope of the organization. Full details on Cycloid website. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid Platform Engineering | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid Platform Engineering | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid Platform Engineering | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Cycloid Platform Engineering Screenshots |









