Cycle vs. Red Hat OpenShift
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle | N/A | N/A | Cycle is a container orchestration platform. By simplifying the processes around container and infrastructure deployments, Cycle aims to enable developers to spend more time building and less time managing. With automatic platform updates, standardized deployments, a powerful API, and bottleneck crushing automation—the platform is designed to give organizations the capabilities of an elite DevOps team. | $0 |
Red Hat OpenShift | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications. | $0.08 per hour |
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 261 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 217 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Happy with the feature set 266 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Implementation went as expected 211 Answers | |
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score9.4 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score7.4 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score7.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.8 |
| Usability | - | 7.6 |
| Availability | - | 5.5 |
| Performance | - | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.3 |
| In-Person Training | - | 7.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.6 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 8.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 7.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Cycle | Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Cycle Screenshots |

