QGuard by CyberQP vs. LogMeIn Resolve

I don't think I have ever encountered a scenario where LogMeIn is inappropriate. I work directly with customers 80% of the time, and even when I need to help a fellow IT professional out, LogMeIn is my go-to option. Viewing and reviewing all the units I manage is very helpful; it saves me a lot of time, especially after the frequent long-term power outages (where it surpasses the USP's protection) we often experience in our area.

Incentivized

• Performs well for remote access in terms of speed - there isn't much lag on fast networks.
• Provides an easy way to share files with the client which stramlines the support process.
• GoTo Support has been responsive when I've needed help.

Incentivized

• More flexibility with customizing the agent dashboard
• Change the support interface to make simultaneous remote session a bit more accessible on the left-side menu
• Include detailed instructions on the agent's screen when helping a Mac user run through all the necessary permissions needed to connect

Incentivized

I would say yes, we would definitely renew, everyone likes it in the IT dept, and there are more features we have yet to put to use. I am expanding the Windows update / Endpoint features as I get time, and the remote PowerShell console is unbeatable for me at present when facing remote computers that are not letting create a new remote PSSession.

Incentivized

Navigation is easy and friendly. It does almost everything, but being cloud, it gets slow. Session recording is allowed. Zoom in and out feature works very well, especially during remote sessions and multiple machine sessions simultaneously. Dual-screen monitors are accessible. East and convenient user interface. The diagnostics feature is outstanding, and it gives detailed diagnostics of the system. So these are the pros that prompt me to provide such ratings.

Incentivized

Usually available without a problem, although sometimes calls get dropped or users sit in empty meeting rooms while waiting for an admin to arrive, while the call is actually going on.

If you are connected to someone with proper bandwidth, there are no issues at all. With all things, if you connect to someone with dial-up (yes, it still exists), the performance is terrible.

Ive used their tech support a handful of times, and each time they have been able to help me sort out any hiccups or kinks that arise. They have a resourceful knowledge base, and have experts available for training and troubleshooting. I often recommend them to my other coworkers and colleagues because of the ease of use and security

Incentivized

we did not have in person training

Incentivized

n/a - wasnt in attendance

Incentivized

GoToAssist SeeIt was very easy to implement. As long as your techs have a basic understanding of most remote support tools they will be able to understand this product easily.

Incentivized

I previously used Dameware but since they came out with the new version, I find it difficult to use. Many times, it takes a long time to connect using Dameware and the added time if it connects at all adds to the user's frustration as well as my own

Incentivized

I wasn't involved with this element of the sale/purchase

Incentivized

The system was implemented quite quickly and easily.

Incentivized

I wasn't involved with this element of the sale/purchase

Incentivized

• We are able to solve 99% of technical issues remotely.
• Our productivity rate has increased because we are able to conveniently seek out assistance in the matter of a few minutes.
• As this is compatible with Microsoft products like teams, this has allowed us to collaborate and save time and money by using existing software to submit tickets for assistance.