Cyberoam vs. Untangle SD-WAN Router

Cyberoam is well suited for enterprises or institutions which require good and precise UTM features which could be used to conduct secure exams and to maintain a strict cyber environment. it is less suited for enterprises with a good change management process, as it would require experienced administrators to main this firewall.

Incentivized

Awesome for most small businesses that need some better protection past their provider's box. Those usually don't handle anything past being a gateway well. Pricing is another thing. The costs are great as compared to the cost of a box plus support and licensing. Untangle really does have the smaller markets taken care of with exactly what they need. Anything more and you'll be looking at a physical solution.

Incentivized

• Firewall logs is good thing that provided by Cyberoam.
• Alerts and logs provided for different type of attacks and actions taken.
• Ease of use functionality.

Incentivized

• VPN
• Works out of the box.
• Simple to use.

Incentivized

• SD Wan features require more clarity.
• Traffic shaping policy is a missing feature.

Incentivized

• GUI is rough.
• Setting up intricate routes are a bit confusing.
• No HA

Incentivized

The main factor is cost, as we are a startup organization. That's the main reason we choose Cyberoam stacks up against other network security services.

Incentivized

Deploying untangle compared to the others is almost night and day. Sophos is amazing but is usually slow on the GUI. Sonicwall is like using black magic to bring someone back from the dead. Untangle hits all the marks for coving your customers without hitting them with enterprise-level costs.

Incentivized

• Positive - time and cost savings on management
• Positive - still best in class for ease of CIPA compliance for K-12
• Negative - escalating costs are pushing us away from the solution

Incentivized

• Low setup Cost.
• Cheap scalability.
• Fast deployment keeps customers happy with low downtime.

Incentivized